首页> 外文会议>World conference on earthquake engineering >DESIGN DRIFT REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES
【24h】

DESIGN DRIFT REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

机译:长期结构的设计漂移要求

获取原文

摘要

The code provisions for calculating the design seismic drift of buildings have been substantially revised over the past 40 years. While these changes in the code are fairly well documented, the reasons behind these changes and the consequences of the changes are not as well known. This paper presents a brief history of design drift requirements, technical background for the requirements, and the reasoning behind the changes, starting with the 1961 Uniform Building Code (UBC) through present day. Emphasis is given to the discussion of minimum base shears for calculation of drift for long-period structures. Specifically, in Section 1630.10.1 of the 1997 UBC, it is not immediately apparent why Equation 30-6 may be disregarded in the calculation of drift while Equation 30-7 may not, since both equations tend to give very similar minimum base shears for typical buildings. In prior versions of the UBC, the minimum design base shear was determined by only one equation that could be disregarded during determination of drift. This paper discusses the reasoning behind Equation 30-7 in the current UBC and discusses the current controversy and differences of opinion regarding this equation. Also discussed are equivalent requirements in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) and Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-02), which require a similar minimum base shear for determining drift of long period structures. Near-fault and non-near-fault earthquake records are analyzed to show the applicability of the use of these minimum base shears for determination of drift and suggested modifications to current building codes are presented.
机译:计算建筑物的设计地震漂移的代码规定已在过去40年内大幅修订。虽然代码中的这些变化符合很好的记录,但这些变化背后的原因以及变化的后果不众所周知。本文介绍了设计漂移要求的简要历史,要求的技术背景以及改变背后的推理,从现在通过1961年统一的建造代码(UBC)。强调对最小基剪的讨论,用于计算长期结构漂移。具体而言,在1997年UBC的第1630.10.1节中,它没有立即显而易见为什么在漂移的计算中可以忽略等式30-6,而等式30-7可能不是,因为两个方程都倾向于给出非常相似的最小基础剪切典型的建筑物。在UBC的先前版本中,仅在确定漂移期间可以忽略一个方程来确定最小设计基剪切。本文讨论了当前UBC中的等式30-7背后的推理,并讨论了当前争议和对该方程的观点差异。还讨论了国家地震危害减少计划(NEHRP)和建筑物和其他结构(ASCE 7-02)的最小设计负荷的等同要求,这需要类似的最小基础剪切来确定长期结构的漂移。分析近故障和非近故障地震记录以显示使用这些最小基剪的适用性,以确定漂移的漂移和建议的修改对当前建筑码。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号