首页> 外文会议>Nordic Society for Radiation Protection ordinary meeting on radiation protection in the 2000s >Mitigation of radon in drinking water of Finnish drilled wells ― Present state and Cost-benefit analysis
【24h】

Mitigation of radon in drinking water of Finnish drilled wells ― Present state and Cost-benefit analysis

机译:芬兰钻井井中饮用水中氡的减轻 - 现状及成本效益分析

获取原文

摘要

The annual collective dose from natural radioactivity of ingested drinking water in Finland is estimated at 260 manSv. The users of drilled wells receive about half of the collective dose, although their proportion of the population is only about 5%. Radon causes approximately 70% of the ingestion dose. Apart from ingested water, consumers are exposed to radon and its decay products when radon is released into indoor air in situations like showering and washing cloths and dishes. The lung cancer risk from inhaled decay products of radon depends strongly on the smoking prevalence in the exposed population. To combine the both exposure paths, ingestion and breathing, it is more feasible to calculate the number of cancer deaths rather than doses. In addition to the number of annual cases, the cost per averted cancer case is influenced by the total costs of the chosen removal method, frequency distribution of radon concentration in the wells and the action level applied. When the action level for radon in drinking water in a private well is exceeded, STUK recommends joining the municipal water system or a water co-operative as a primary alternative. These options assure both the quality of drinking water and a proper wastewater disposal. However, neither of these alternatives is commonly available in sparsely populated areas. Another viable choice is to dig a well into the soil. If none of these alternatives is possible, two methods can be used for removing radon from drinking water: aeration and activated carbon filtration. If the filtration method is used without adequate shielding, an additional dose may incur due to external gamma radiation emitted by the short-lived decay products of radon that are retained in the carbon. STUK recommends that an activated carbon filter unit not be installed inside a dwelling, but be placed in a separate building or in the subsurface service space beside the drilled well.
机译:芬兰摄入饮用水自然放射性的年度集体剂量估计为260兆夫。钻井井的用户获得了集体剂量的一半,尽管它们的群体比例仅为5%。氡导致约70%的摄取剂量。除了摄入的水外,消费者暴露于氡及其腐烂产品,当氡被释放到室内空气中,如淋浴和洗涤布和洗碗。吸入氡产品的肺癌风险强烈依赖于暴露群体的吸烟患病率。为了结合两个曝光路径,摄取和呼吸,计算癌症死亡数而不是剂量更加可行。除了年案件的数量外,每个抗病癌症案例的成本受到所选择的去除方法的总成本,井中氡浓度的频率分布和应用的作用水平的影响。当超过私营井中饮用水中氡的动作水平时,Stuk建议将市政水系统或水合作作为主要替代品。这些选项确保了饮用水的质量和适当的废水处理。然而,这些替代方案都不是稀疏人口稠密的区域。另一个可行的选择是挖掘土壤。如果没有这些替代方案,则可以使用两种方法来从饮用水中除去氡:通气和活性炭过滤。如果在没有足够屏蔽的情况下使用过滤方法,则由于由保留在碳中的氡的短衰减腐蚀产品发出的外部伽马辐射,因此可以产生额外的剂量。 Stuk建议未在住宅内安装活性炭过滤器单元,但放置在单独的建筑物或钻井旁边的地下服务空间中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号