首页> 外文会议>IFAC World Congress >Accuracy Analysis of Time-domain Maximum Likelihood Method and Sample Maximum Likelihood Method for Errors-in-Variables Identification
【24h】

Accuracy Analysis of Time-domain Maximum Likelihood Method and Sample Maximum Likelihood Method for Errors-in-Variables Identification

机译:时域最大似然方法的准确性分析和样本最大似然方法识别错误

获取原文

摘要

The time domain maximum likelihood (TML) method and the sample maximum Likelihood (SML) method are two approaches for identifying errors-in-variables models. Both methods may give the optimal estimation accuracy (achieve Cramer-Rao lower bound) but in different senses. In the TML method, an important assumption is that the noise-free input signal is modeled as a stationary process with rational spectrum. For SML, the noise-free input needs to be periodic. It is interesting to know which of these assumptions contain more information to boost the estimation performance. In this paper, the estimation accuracy of the two methods is analyzed statistically. Numerical comparisons between the two estimates are also done under different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The results suggest that TML and SML have similar estimation accuracy at moderate or high SNR.
机译:时域最大可能性(TML)方法和样本最大似然(SML)方法是用于识别变量错误模型的两种方法。两种方法都可以提供最佳估计精度(实现Cramer-Rao下限),但在不同的感觉中。在TML方法中,重要的假设是无噪声输入信号被建模为具有合理频谱的静止过程。对于SML,无噪声输入需要定期。有趣的是要知道这些假设中哪一个包含更多信息以提高估计性能。本文在统计上分析了两种方法的估计准确性。两个估计之间的数值比较也在不同的信噪比(SNR)下进行。结果表明,TML和SML在中等或高SNR处具有类似的估计精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号