首页> 外文会议>Air Waste Management Association's Annual conference Exhibition >Evaluation Projects vs Environmental Ethics, Law Money
【24h】

Evaluation Projects vs Environmental Ethics, Law Money

机译:评估项目与环境伦理,法律和金钱

获取原文

摘要

Mexico City's air pollution is a very unique case that is known around the world, and in many ways as the old west in the USA; a great attraction for gold diggers and pyrite salesmen. Projects to curtail air pollution in Mexico City have appeared in an endless science fiction catalog. Although many of these projects have been presented in good faith to achieve good, on the contrary, others are very well planned fallacies with only one goal; EASY MONEY. Aditionaly in some isolated cases these well planned fallacies are alleged to be supported by serious academical institutions in some way or another. The Case 4 project, one of four being presented in this paper, is an excellent example of a very well planned fallacy by pyrite salesmen. This project was introduced to the Mexico City authorities as a unique control alternative for the suspended particulated matter pollution in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City. This project claimed that 20,000 small filters would be installed in one of the 16 areas that conform Mexico City. These filters would have to filtrate aproximately 2,500 Km~3 of polluted air in the boundary layer of the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA). Based upon these results this filtering network could be expanded to all the City (8-9 million filters would be required to cover the MCMA area). After the proposal was made public and claimed to be supported by the Center of Atmospheric Sciences at the National University of Mexico, immediately the University was approached by several professional associations to clarifyed our position, since it looked very outrageous for any Center of the National University of Mexico, to give public support to such a project. Because of the academic people involved with atmospheric dynamics and pollution did not participate in such a project, we carried out an inquirey to find out the person responsable for such statements; the finding of this inquirey was published in a prestigious newspaper. This action gave someone a surprise: A legal pursuit was claimed against my person for defamation.
机译:墨西哥城的空气污染是一个非常独特的案例,世界各地都是众所周知的,并且在许多方面都是美国的老西方;金挖掘机和黄铁矿销售人员的一个很好的吸引力。在墨西哥城遏制空气污染的项目出现在无休止的科幻小说目录中。虽然许多这些项目都是为了诚信地呈现​​良好的,但相反,其他人也是一个非常有计划的谬误,只有一个目标;快钱。在某些孤立案件中,这些良好规划的谬误被据称,以某种方式得到了严肃的学者机构的支持。案件4项目,本文中提供的四个项目之一,是黄铁矿销售人员策略良好的谬误的重要例子。该项目被介绍给墨西哥城当局作为墨西哥城大都市区暂停的微粒物质污染的独特控制替代品。该项目声称,在符合墨西哥城的16个区域之一,将安装20,000个小型过滤器。这些过滤器必须在墨西哥城大都市区(MCMA)的边界层中对污染的空气充满了大约2,500公里〜3。根据这些结果,该过滤网络可以扩展到所有城市(8-900万个过滤器需要覆盖MCMA区域)。提案公开并声称是墨西哥大学大气科学中心的支持,立即将大学接近几个专业协会,以澄清我们的立场,因为它对国家大学的任何中心看起来非常令人束缚墨西哥,向这样的项目提供公共支持。由于参与大气动力学和污染的学术人民没有参加这样的项目,我们进行了调查,了解对此类陈述负责的人;这次调查的发现是在一个着名的报纸上发表的。这一行动给了某人一个惊喜:对我的人违法声称,法律追求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号