首页> 外文会议>International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium >Biological treatment of wastewaters from pesticide and starch manufacture
【24h】

Biological treatment of wastewaters from pesticide and starch manufacture

机译:农药和淀粉制造废水的生物处理

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Treatment processes were developed for two different industrial wastewaters, both with a high COD. Both processes involved aerobic treatment and removed substantial quantities of pollutants. The similarity ends there, as the microbial populations and the results differed in almost every possible way. The pesticide wastewater had a high COD and contained a variety of pesticides, mainly endosulphan 1 and 2, diazinon, malathion, atrazine, simazine, chlorpyrifos and others in a total concentrations of c. 1.6 g/L. Normal disposal methodology involves encapsulation and costs several thousands of dollars per cubic meter. The bench-scale research described in this paper involved ozonation, biological granulated activated carbon treatment, biofilter treatment only and chemical coagulation with microfiltration. A process without activated carbon was studied in parallel. Both the biofilter and biological activated carbon with coagulation and separation with microfiltation were able to remove about 99% of most pesticides, with the bulk of the removal occurring during the biological treatment stage. A notable exception was simazine, which left persistent residues. While ozonation improved the COD removal, it was not deemed an essential treatment component. The effluent would have been suitable for sewer discharge with costs two orders of magnitude less than encapsulation. The starch wastewater had a COD of 12300 mg/L (of which 7900 mg/L soluble), a BOD of c. 9600 mg/L, a TOC of 4550 mg/L and presented a disposal problem mainly as high sewer discharge feeds to the manufacturer. A single, nonaseptic fungal treatment process was developed, which not only removed 95% of the BOD and 78 to 85% of the total organic carbon (TOC), but produced a biomass product with a protein content of 38 to 48%, suitable for animal feeds. Different strains of Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizopus arrhizus were found to be suitable, but the efficiency of conversion of waste to fungi was substantially influenced by the species and strain of organism selected. The yield achievable was 1.3 to 1.44 g biomass/g TOC. Addition of plant nutrients was not essential, but some increase in biomass production could be achieved with phosphate, magnesium and calcium supplementation. An air lift reactor configuration was developed with air spargers and external recirculation resulting in velocity gradients which favored the growth of pelletized colonies. These are easily harvested and dewatered by screening. Further dewatering could be done with a simple process such as belt pressing. The product has a potential value of
机译:为两种不同的工业废水开发治疗方法,既具有高鳕鱼。这两种过程都涉及有氧处理并除去大量的污染物。相似性以微生物群体结束,并且结果几乎不同的方式不同。农药废水具有高鳕鱼并包含各种农药,主要是硫代硫妥1和2,二嗪顿,马拉硫磷,阿特拉嗪,Simazine,氯吡啶,以及总浓度的C. 1.6克/升。正常处理方法涉及封装,每立方米花费数千美元。本文中描述的台阶规模研究涉及臭氧化,生物颗粒状活性炭处理,生物过滤处理,并具有微滤的化学凝固。没有并行研究没有活性炭的过程。生物过滤器和生物活性炭均具有凝血和分离的微塑料能够去除约99%的大多数农药,在生物处理期间发生大部分去除。一个值得注意的例外是Simazine,它留下了持久的残留物。虽然Ozonation改善了COD去除,但它没有被认为是必需的治疗组分。流出物适用于下水道排放,成本比封装的2个数量级。淀粉废水的鳕鱼具有12300 mg / L(其中7900mg / L可溶性),C的核心。 9600 Mg / L,TOC为4550毫克/升,并主要出现处理问题,主要是高水平的排放给制造商。开发了单一的非渗透真菌处理过程,该方法不仅除去了95%的BOD和总有机碳(TOC)的78%至85%,而是产生蛋白质含量为38%至48%的生物质产品,适用于动物饲料。发现不同的曲霉属植物和rhizopus arrhizus是合适的,但废物转化对真菌的效率显着受到所选择的生物体物种和生物的影响。可实现的产量为1.3至1.44g生物量/ g TOC。添加植物营养素不是必需的,但可以通过磷酸盐,镁和钙来实现生物质产生的一些增加。使用空气速度和外部再循环开发了一种空气升降反应器配置,导致速度梯度,这些梯度偏振梯度有利于造粒菌落的生长。这些通过筛选易于收获和脱水。可以通过诸如皮带压制的简单过程来完成进一步的脱水。该产品具有潜在的价值

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号