首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding >A Study on the Economic Incentives of Welding Steel Pipelines Using Friction Stir Welding
【24h】

A Study on the Economic Incentives of Welding Steel Pipelines Using Friction Stir Welding

机译:摩擦搅拌焊接焊接钢水管经济激励措施研究

获取原文

摘要

Pipelines have long been a key component in the transportation and distribution of petroleum resources. Reducing pipeline cost to improve the economics of transportation is critical to the economic development of resources in remote locations. This paper addresses the economics of using friction stir welding (FSW) for pipeline construction. An economic analysis was conducted to compare pipeline construction costs based on the use of FSW versus conventional gas metal arc welding (GMAW). Both onshore and offshore pipeline construction scenarios were considered in the study. The onshore GMAW scenario was based on internal root welding followed by external (bug and band) mechanized GMAW. The offshore scenario was based on the J-lay technique where all welding is conducted from the outside of the pipe at a single welding station. The base case pipe diameters for onshore and offshore were assumed to be 42" and 12", respectively. For the purposes of the study, it was assumed that non-destructive evaluation (NDE) costs and repair rates would be equal between GMAW and FSW. Several assumptions were also made during the study with respect to such factors as FSW tool cost and tool life based on laboratory experience with FSW of pipeline steel. The analysis resulted in an estimate that FSW offers about 7% construction cost savings for onshore construction. It was also concluded that the use of an internal GMAW root weld to support an external FSW butt weld is significantly more efficient for large diameter, onshore construction than using an internal mandrel to support the FSW process. The estimated savings for J-lay offshore construction using the FSW process was found to be approximately 25%. For both the onshore and offshore scenarios, the sensitivity of the expected savings to key factors is presented. These key factors include: FSW equipment and tool costs, tool life, welding speed, and pipe wall thickness. It was found that savings increase with increase in wall thickness due to replacement of multiple arc welding passes with a single FSW pass.
机译:管道长期以来一直是石油资源运输和分配的关键组成部分。减少流水线成本以改善运输经济性对偏远地区资源的经济发展至关重要。本文涉及使用摩擦搅拌焊接(FSW)进行管道结构的经济学。进行了经济分析,以比较基于FSW的流水线施工成本与常规气体金属电弧焊接(GMAW)的使用。在研究中考虑了陆上和海上管道施工方案。陆上的GMAW方案基于内部根焊接,然后是外部(虫子和频段)机械化的GMAW。离岸方案基于J铺设技术,其中所有焊接都从管道外部在单个焊接站的外部进行。陆上和海上的基本情况管道直径分别假设为42“和12”。出于该研究的目的,假设非破坏性评估(NDE)成本和维修率在GMAW和FSW之间是平等的。在研究期间还根据FSW工具成本和工具生活的研究,基于与管道钢的FSW的实验室经验,在研究期间进行了若干假设。分析导致估计,FSW提供约7%的陆上建设的建筑成本节约。还有得出的结论是,使用内部GMAW根焊接来支撑外部FSW对接焊缝,对于大直径,船体施工比使用内部心轴来支持FSW工艺。使用FSW过程估计为J-Lay海上建设的节省约为25%。对于陆上和海上情景来说,提出了预期节省对关键因素的敏感性。这些关键因素包括:FSW设备和工具成本,工具寿命,焊接速度和管壁厚度。发现由于更换多个电弧焊接通过单个FSW通道,节省的节省随着壁厚的增加而增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号