首页> 外文会议>IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering >An Evidence-Based Inquiry into the Use of Grey Literature in Software Engineering
【24h】

An Evidence-Based Inquiry into the Use of Grey Literature in Software Engineering

机译:基于证据的软件工程中灰色文献的探讨

获取原文

摘要

Context: Following on other scientific disciplines, such as health sciences, the use of Grey Literature (GL) has become widespread in Software Engineering (SE) research. Whilst the number of papers incorporating GL in SE is increasing, there is little empirically known about different aspects of the use of GL in SE research. Method: We used a mixed-methods approach for this research. We carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of the use of GL in SE, and surveyed the authors of the selected papers included in the SLR (as GL users) and the invited experts in SE community on the use of GL in SE research. Results: We systematically selected and reviewed 102 SE secondary studies that incorporate GL in SE research, from which we identified two groups based on their reporting: 1) 76 reviews only claim their use of GL; 2) 26 reviews report the results by including GL. We also obtained 20 replies from the GL users and 24 replies from the invited SE experts. Conclusion: There is no common understanding of the meaning of GL in SE. Researchers define the scopes and the definitions of GL in a variety of ways. We found five main reasons of using GL in SE research. The findings have enabled us to propose a conceptual model for how GL works in SE research lifecycle. There is an apparent need for research to develop guidelines for using GL in SE and for assessing quality of GL. The current work can provide a panorama of the state-of-the-art of using GL in SE for the follow-up research, as to determine the important position of GL in SE research.
机译:背景信息:遵循其他科学学科,如健康科学,灰色文学(GL)的使用在软件工程(SE)研究中已经普遍存在。虽然在SE中的GL掺入GL的纸张数量增加时,但在SE研究中使用GL的不同方面几乎已知。方法:我们使用了这种研究的混合方法方法。我们对SE中使用的GL进行了系统的文献综述(SLR),并调查了SLR(作为GL用户)中所包含的选定文件的作者以及SE社区中的邀请专家在SE研究中使用GL 。结果:我们系统地选择并审查了包含GL在SE研究中的102 SE二级研究,我们根据其报告确定了两组:1)76条评论仅申请使用GL; 2)26条评论通过GL包括GL。我们还从GL用户获得了20份回复,并从邀请的SE专家提供24份回复。结论:对SE中GL的含义没有共同的常识。研究人员以各种方式定义了GL的范围和GL的定义。我们在SE研究中找到了使用GL的五个主要原因。调查结果使我们能够提出一种概念模型,了解GL如何研究SE研究生命周期。有明显需要研究在SE中使用GL和评估GL的质量来制定使用GL的指南。目前的工作可以提供在SE中使用GL的最先进的全景,以确定GL在SE研究中的重要地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号