【24h】

Ambivalence in Stakeholders' Views on Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

机译:利益相关者对互联和自动驾驶汽车的看法含糊不清

获取原文

摘要

Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) are often discussed as a solution to pressing issues of the current transport systems, including congestion, safety, social inclusion and ecological sustainability. Scientifically, there is agreement that CAVs may solve, but can also aggravate these issues, depending on the specific CAV solution. In the current paper, we investigate the visions and worst-case scenarios of various stakeholders, including representatives of public administrations, automotive original equipment manufacturers, insurance companies, public transportation service providers, mobility experts and politicians. A qualitative analysis of 17 semi-structured interviews is presented. It reveals experts' ambivalence towards the introduction of CAVs, reflecting high levels of uncertainty about CAV consequences, including issues of efficiency, comfort and sustainability, and concerns about co-road users such as pedestrians and cyclists. Implications of the sluggishness of policymakers to set boundary conditions and for the labor market are discussed. An open debate between policymakers, citizens and other stakeholders on how to introduce CAVs seems timely.
机译:互联自动驾驶汽车(CAV)通常作为解决当前交通运输系统紧迫问题的解决方案而被讨论,包括交通拥堵,安全,社会包容性和生态可持续性。从科学上讲,CAV可以解决,但也可能加剧这些问题,具体取决于特定的CAV解决方案。在本文中,我们调查了各种利益相关者的愿景和最坏情况,包括公共管理部门,汽车原始设备制造商,保险公司,公共交通服务提供商,交通运输专家和政界人士的代表。对17个半结构化访谈进行了定性分析。它揭示了专家对引入CAV的矛盾态度,反映出人们对CAV后果的高度不确定性,包括效率,舒适性和可持续性问题,以及对诸如行人和骑自行车者等道路使用者的担忧。讨论了决策者制定边界条件的迟缓和对劳动力市场的影响。决策者,公民和其他利益相关者之间就如何引入CAV进行公开辩论似乎是及时的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号