首页> 外文会议>International Joint Conference on Computer, Information, and Systems Sciences, and Engineering >A Critical Review on World University Ranking in Terms of Top Four Ranking Systems
【24h】

A Critical Review on World University Ranking in Terms of Top Four Ranking Systems

机译:在四大四排名系统方面对世界大学排名的批判性综述

获取原文

摘要

Now-a-days ranking of universities and institutions has become an appealing topic to study or research, and it has got wide attention to all over the world to recognize the top higher education institutes. Therefore, study on the strategies of the ranking system is vital to ensure the acceptability. There are number of strategies have been developed to rank higher education institutions worldwide. This Study has focused to critically evaluate the potential shortcomings of the top four widely accepted ranking systems. These are the Times World University Rankings, QS World University Rankings, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) and Webometrics Ranking. We critically reviewed and analyzed these four higher education ranking systems to identify potential shortcomings in their strategies. Based on our investigation, it was observed that none of these ranking systems can provide satisfactory evaluation in terms of their construct validity and other parameters related to disputation. Nevertheless, these ranking systems are the most popular for what they have been doing over the decades but unfortunately each and every one of them has to some extent lacking as far as ranking excellency is concerned. Lack of availability of data and publications through which ranking is done is one major obstacle faced to determine the authenticity of ranking systems. Overall observation of these four ranking systems reflects the fact that generic challenges include adjustment for institutional size, differences between average and extreme, defining the institutions, measurement of time frame, credit allocation, excellency factors as well as adjustment for scientific fields. Misinterpretation of measurement data is also responsible for some of the ranking disputes. We have proposed a number of recommendations that could address the identified inadequacy and considerably improve the ranking system as well as incorporate more participation of higher education institutes form developing world.
机译:现在,大学和机构的日期排名已成为学习或研究的吸引人的话题,并广泛关注世界各地的高等教育机构。因此,对排名系统的策略研究至关重要,以确保可接受性。已经制定了数量的策略来排名全球高等教育机构。本研究重点是重点评估前四个广泛接受的排名系统的潜在缺点。这些是世界大学排名,QS世界大学排名,世界大学学术排名(ARWU)和Webometrics排名。我们彻底审查和分析了这四个高等教育排名系统,以确定其策略中的潜在缺点。根据我们的调查,观察到这些排名系统都不能在构建与争议相关的其他参数方面提供令人满意的评估。然而,这些排名系统是他们在几十年中所做的最受欢迎,而且很遗憾,他们每个人都必须在某种程度上缺乏诸如善于排名。缺乏数据和出版物的可用性,通过哪个排名是确定排名系统的真实性的一个主要障碍。对这四种排名系统的总体观察反映了通用挑战包括调整机构规模,平均和极端之间的差异,定义时间框架,信贷分配,卓越因素的差异以及科学领域的调整。对测量数据的误解也是一些排名争议的负责。我们提出了一些可能解决所确定的不足和大大改善排名制度的建议,并纳入更多的高等教育机构形成发展中国家的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号