首页> 外文会议>International annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Management >A REVIEW OF NON ABET ACCREDITED ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
【24h】

A REVIEW OF NON ABET ACCREDITED ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

机译:非阿贝特认可的工程管理计划的回顾

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper is the second in a series studying the curriculum and accreditation of engineering management (EM) related programs. The first paper examined the auricular content of engineering management programs to determine common approaches and courses in fulfilling the engineering credits required for ABET accreditation. This paper examines the programs which appeared in an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) listing of undergraduate EM programs which appeared to be non ABET accredited and found a number of issues. First there appears to be a strong trend among these programs to pursue ABET accreditation. Interestingly, this trend is split between three ABET commissions: EAC, ETAC, and ASAC. Second, there is inconsistency in nomenclature and data classification in the system employed to gather the ASEE information. As a result, there were a number of misclassifications found in the ASEE data listing. Finally, as an extension of the second point, there are programs in this ASEE list that are clearly not EM and should not be included in a listing of EM programs.
机译:本文是研究工程管理(EM)相关课程的课程和认证的系列文章中的第二篇。第一篇论文研究了工程管理计划的耳语内容,以确定实现ABET认证所需的工程学分的通用方法和课程。本文研究了出现在美国工程教育学会(ASEE)列出的本科EM程序中的程序,这些程序似乎未经ABET认可,并发现了许多问题。首先,在这些计划中似乎有寻求ABET认证的强烈趋势。有趣的是,这种趋势分为三个ABET委员会:EAC,ETAC和ASAC。其次,在用于收集ASEE信息的系统中,术语和数据分类不一致。结果,在ASEE数据列表中发现了许多错误分类。最后,作为第二点的扩展,此ASEE列表中的某些程序显然不是EM,因此不应包含在EM程序列表中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号