首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Asian Language Processing >A General Comparison on Sentences Analysis and Its Teaching Significance between Traditional and Structural Grammars
【24h】

A General Comparison on Sentences Analysis and Its Teaching Significance between Traditional and Structural Grammars

机译:句子分析的一般比较及传统结构语法之间的教学意义

获取原文

摘要

Grammar is familiar to all of us. We have learned grammar for many years. But now we come to a new field in which grammar is not exactly the same as before. Here we mainly talk about two kinds of them, traditional grammar and structural grammar. Traditional grammar, also called school grammar, is a type of grammar first developed in Europe in the eighteenth century, based on Aristotelian logic and ancient Greek and Latin Grammars, often as an aid to learning these languages and interpreting classical texts. When we talked about structural grammar, we should firstly look at the Structural Linguistics. The structural grammar is based on the theory of Structural Linguistics. Structuralism is a collective term for a number of linguistic approaches in the first half of the twentieth century, all based on the work of F. de Saussure, but strongly divergent from one another. Depending on theoretical preconceptions, the term ‘structuralism’ is used in several ways. In this essay we will make a general comparison between them, which could give us a better understanding about each of them.
机译:语法熟悉我们所有人。我们已经学到了语法多年了。但现在我们来到一个新的领域,其中语法与以前没有完全相同。在这里,我们主要谈论它们的两种,传统的语法和结构语法。传统的语法,也称为学校语法,是一系列在十八世纪首次发达的语法,基于亚里士多德逻辑和古希腊和拉丁语法,往往是学习这些语言和解释古典文本的援助。当我们谈论结构语法时,我们应该首先看看结构语言学。结构语法基于结构语言学理论。结构主义是二十世纪上半叶的一系列语言方法的集体术语,全部基于F. De Saussure的工作,但强烈地偏离彼此。根据理论先入解,术语“结构主义”是以多种方式使用的。在本文中,我们将在他们之间进行一般的比较,这可以让我们更好地了解他们每个人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号