首页> 外文会议>Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference >AVIATION SECURITY COLLABORATION STAKEHOLDER GOVERNANCEREVIEW
【24h】

AVIATION SECURITY COLLABORATION STAKEHOLDER GOVERNANCEREVIEW

机译:航空安全合作利益相关者署长

获取原文

摘要

Aviation security requires collaboration across organizations in multiple mission areas and locations. Each organization is bound by governance which can be dictated by laws, regulations, or other rules. But much of that governance is written in vague language, where execution is left to interpretation. This can result in confusion as to which rules are legally binding, which are optional, or which are done solely as a matter of practice. Lastly, the governance often does not clearly define each organization's roles and responsibilities. To plan for and understand this legal environment better, The MITRE Corporation, as part of its Aviation Security Collaboration (ASC) research, conducted a Stakeholder Governance Review. The governance review produced a Rules Reference Guide, or a collection of pertinent aviation security laws, regulations, orders, directives, procedures, and references to other documentation, all of which arc referred to as "rules". The rules were then categorized by domain: Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, Industry, Transportation, and International. This paper summarizes those domains' rules by describing the legal authorities under which each organization is authorized to act, highlighting particular rules of interest, and describing the collaboration activities regarding getting and sharing information,understandinginformation,andcoordinating operations with security partners. The governance review provided insight into the collaborative nature of the aviation security legal environment. It was found that more than two thirds of the rules were applicable to more than one domain, which implies that collaboration is required across organizations to execute the rules. As the ASC research is refined and tested, the governance review will provide the background to ensure that the research recommendations are feasible from a legal and agency policy standpoint.
机译:航空安全要求在多个任务领域和地点的组织中进行合作。每个组织受到治理的约束,可以由法律,法规或其他规则决定。但是,这种治理是用模糊的语言写的,其中执行被遗弃解释。这可能导致困惑,关于哪些规则是具有法律约束力的,这些规则是可选的,或者仅作为实践的问题完成。最后,治理往往没有明确定义每个组织的角色和责任。为了更好地计划和了解这一法律环境,作为其航空安全合作(ASC)研究的一部分,仲裁公司进行了利益攸关方治理审查。治理审查制定了规则参考指南,或收集关于其他文件的相关航空安全法律,法规,订单,指令,程序和参考,所有这些文件都被称为“规则”。然后按领域分类规则:国防,国土安全,司法,行业,交通和国际。本文通过描述各组织被授权行动的法定权限来概述这些域名规则,突出了特定的利息规则,并描述了有关获取和共享信息,了解信息,以及与安全伙伴的协作活动的合作活动。治理审查提供了对航空安全法律环境的协作性质的洞察力。有人发现,三分之二的规则适用于多个域,这意味着跨组织需要协作来执行规则。随着ASC研究精制和测试,治理审查将提供背景,以确保研究建议是从法律和代理政策的角度来看可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号