首页> 外文会议>2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics >Effect of a robotic rehabilitation device on upper limb function in a sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury population
【24h】

Effect of a robotic rehabilitation device on upper limb function in a sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury population

机译:机器人康复设备对亚急性颈脊髓损伤人群上肢功能的影响

获取原文

摘要

Robotic rehabilitation devices have been suggested as a tool to increase the amount of rehabilitation delivered after a neurological injury. Clinical robotic rehabilitation studies of the upper extremity have generally focused on stroke survivors. We present the results of a multi-center pilot study where an upper-limb robotic rehabilitation device (Armeo Spring®, Hocoma AG) was incorporated into the rehabilitation program of 12 subjects with sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury (motor level C4-C6, AIS A-D). Outcomes were measured using two tests of upper extremity function: ARAT and GRASSP. The change in scores for the arm receiving the Armeo training were not statistically significant when compared to the arm not receiving the Armeo training at discharge from therapy and over follow up assessments (8.7 +/− 2.9 compared to 7.4 +/− 2.5 for ARAT at discharge, p = 0.98, and 13.0 +/− 3.2 compared to 13.3 +/− 3.3 for GRASSP at discharge, p = 0.69). Nevertheless, subjects with some minimal (partial) hand function at baseline had a significantly larger increase in GRASSP scores than subjects with no minimal hand function preserved at baseline (19.3 +/− 2.4 compared to 6.6 +/− 4.7, p = 0.02). This suggests that the initial functional capabilities of patients can influence the benefits measured after robotic rehabilitation training and heterogeneous subject populations should be avoided in early phase studies.
机译:已经提出了机器人康复设备作为增加神经损伤后进行的康复量的工具。上肢的临床机器人康复研究通常集中于中风幸存者。我们介绍了一项多中心试验研究的结果,其中将上肢机器人康复设备(ArmeoSpring®,Hocoma AG)纳入了12例亚急性颈脊髓损伤(运动水平C4-C6)的康复计划中,AIS AD)。使用两种上肢功能测试来评估结局:ARAT和GRASSP。与在治疗后出院及后续评估中未接受Armeo训练的手臂相比,接受Armeo训练的手臂的得分变化在统计学上无显着性(8.7 +/- 2.9,而ARAT在7.4 +/- 2.5放电时,p = 0.98和13.0 +/- 3.2,而放电时GRASSP的13.3 +/- 3.3,p = 0.69)。但是,基线时具有一些最小(部分)手部功能的受试者与基线时没有保留最小手部功能的受试者相比,GRASSP得分的增加明显更大(19.3 +/- 2.4,而6.6 +/- 4.7,p = 0.02)。这表明患者的初始功能能力可能会影响机器人康复训练后测得的收益,因此在早期研究中应避免异类受试者群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号