首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics >Effect of a robotic rehabilitation device on upper limb function in a sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury population
【24h】

Effect of a robotic rehabilitation device on upper limb function in a sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury population

机译:机器人康复装置对亚急性颈脊髓损伤群中肢体功能的影响

获取原文

摘要

Robotic rehabilitation devices have been suggested as a tool to increase the amount of rehabilitation delivered after a neurological injury. Clinical robotic rehabilitation studies of the upper extremity have generally focused on stroke survivors. We present the results of a multi-center pilot study where an upper-limb robotic rehabilitation device (Armeo Spring®, Hocoma AG) was incorporated into the rehabilitation program of 12 subjects with sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury (motor level C4-C6, AIS A-D). Outcomes were measured using two tests of upper extremity function: ARAT and GRASSP. The change in scores for the arm receiving the Armeo training were not statistically significant when compared to the arm not receiving the Armeo training at discharge from therapy and over follow up assessments (8.7 +/− 2.9 compared to 7.4 +/− 2.5 for ARAT at discharge, p = 0.98, and 13.0 +/− 3.2 compared to 13.3 +/− 3.3 for GRASSP at discharge, p = 0.69). Nevertheless, subjects with some minimal (partial) hand function at baseline had a significantly larger increase in GRASSP scores than subjects with no minimal hand function preserved at baseline (19.3 +/− 2.4 compared to 6.6 +/− 4.7, p = 0.02). This suggests that the initial functional capabilities of patients can influence the benefits measured after robotic rehabilitation training and heterogeneous subject populations should be avoided in early phase studies.
机译:已经提出了机器人康复装置作为增加神经损伤后递送的康复量的工具。上肢的临床机器人康复研究通常集中在中风幸存者上。我们介绍了一个多中心试验研究的结果,其中肢体机器人康复装置(Armeo Spring®,霍克马AG)纳入了12项受试者的恢复程序中,具有亚急性颈脊髓损伤(电机水平C4 -c6,ais广告)。使用上肢功能的两个测试测量结果:ARAT和GRANDP。接受ARMEO训练的臂的分数的变化在与从治疗和后续评估中没有接收到armeo训练(8.7+ /− 2.9相比7.4和7.4− 2.9相比7.4和7.4和7.4和7.4和7.4和7.4)时没有统计学意义#x002b; /− 2.5用于放电,p= 0.98和13.0+ /− 3.2与13.3+ /− 3.3放电的草地,p= 0.69)。尽管如此,基线中具有一些最小(部分)手功能的受试者比在基线(19.3+ /− 2.6与6.6&#x002b相比,Grassp Scors的Grassp评分增加了/− 4.7,p= 0.02)。这表明患者的初始功能能力可以影响机器人康复训练和在早期研究中应避免异质对象群体测量的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号