首页> 外文会议>2011 IEEE Digital Signal Processing Workshop and IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop >Signals and systems assessment: Comparison of responses to multiple choice conceptual questions and open-ended final exam problems
【24h】

Signals and systems assessment: Comparison of responses to multiple choice conceptual questions and open-ended final exam problems

机译:信号和系统评估:对多项选择题和开放式期末考试问题的回答比较

获取原文

摘要

The validity of the Signals and Systems Concept Inventory (SSCI) was evaluated by comparing students' performance on the SSCI to open-ended final exam problems. An assessment instrument is said to be valid to the extent that it measures what it was designed to measure. The SSCI was designed to measure students' understanding of core concepts in undergraduate signals and systems (S&S) courses through 25 multiple choice questions. The SSCI scores and final exam scores for more than 150 students in four sections of S&S at two schools were found to have a statistically significant correlation. A more detailed analysis was conducted with a pool of over 60 students at both schools. This second analysis compared detailed coding of students' responses on the final exam problems to their answers for specific SSCI questions assessing the same topic. This analysis found statistically significant correlations between SSCI questions and final exam problems for some convolution and Fourier transform problems. Results were mixed for the problem on Bode plots.
机译:通过将学生在SSCI上的表现与开放式期末考试问题进行比较,评估了信号和系统概念清单(SSCI)的有效性。据称,评估工具在衡量其设计衡量标准的范围内是有效的。 SSCI旨在通过25个多项选择题来衡量学生对本科生信号与系统(S&S)课程中核心概念的理解。发现两所学校S&S四个部分的150多名学生的SSCI分数和期末考试分数具有统计学显着的相关性。对两所学校的60多名学生进行了更详细的分析。第二个分析比较了学生对期末考试问题的答案的详细编码与他们针对评估同一主题的特定SSCI问题的答案的编码。该分析发现,对于某些卷积和傅立叶变换问题,SSCI问题和期末考试问题之间存在统计学上的显着相关性。在Bode地块上,该问题的结果好坏参半。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号