首页> 外文会议>Airfield and highway pavement conference >Comparison between Mechanistic Analysis and In-Situ Response of Full-depth Flexible Pavements
【24h】

Comparison between Mechanistic Analysis and In-Situ Response of Full-depth Flexible Pavements

机译:全深度柔性路面机械分析与原位响应的比较

获取原文

摘要

Accurate prediction of tensile strain at the bottom of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) is crucial for mechanistic pavement analysis. In this study, transverse tensile strain at the bottom of HMA was calculated using mechanistic analysis and compared to measured values from test sections exposed to accelerated pavement testing (APT). Three full-depth flexible pavement sections having 152, 254, and 420mm of HMA placed on 300mm of lime-stabilized subgrade were constructed and exposed to APT using the Advanced Transportation Loading ASsembly (ATLAS), housed at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Transverse tensile strain histories at the bottom of HMA under various loading conditions (load, tire pressure, and speed) were measured through embedded strain gauges at the HMA-stabilized subgrade interface. Indirect tensile complex modulus tests for three HMA materials were conducted using an Instron Universal Test Machine (UTM). The elastic modulus of subgrade was backcalculated from FWD testing conducted on the test sections. The pavement responses of test sections were calculated using the NCHRP 1-37A Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) procedure as well as a finite element model. In general, the MEPDG approach underestimates the transverse and longitudinal strains when the pavement thickness is equal to or smaller than 254mm; the difference is more manifested at shallow depths below 152mm. Hence, the pavement thickness design based on MEPDG procedure could underestimate the pavement fatigue damage for thin pavements. Inaccurate calculation of the loading pulse period and the empirical conversion between loading period and frequency are among the assumptions that contribute significantly to the ill-prediction of pavement responses when current NCHRP 1-37A is used. A 3D finite element model, on the other hand, was developed in order to predict pavement response to tire loading. The model considers measured tire-pavement contact stresses, continuous moving-wheel loading, implicit dynamic analysis, and HMA viscoelastic characteristics. Difference between measured and predicted strains was found to be within 5%.
机译:热混合沥青(HMA)底部的拉伸应变精确预测是机械路面分析至关重要。在该研究中,使用机械分析计算HMA底部的横向拉伸应变,并与从暴露于加速路面测试(APT)的测试部分的测量值相比。构造了具有152,254和420mm的HMA的三个全深度柔性路面部分,并使用先进的运输装载组件(阿特拉斯)在Urbana-Champaign的伊利诺伊大学。通过HMA稳定的路基界面处的嵌入式应变仪测量各种负载条件(负载,轮胎压力和速度)下的HMA底部的横向拉伸应变历史。使用Instron Universal试验机(UTM)进行三个HMA材料的间接拉伸复合体模量试验。从测试部门进行的FWD测试中划分了基质的弹性模量。使用NCHRP 1-37A机械经验路面设计指南(MEPDG)程序以及有限元模型来计算测试部分的路面响应。通常,MEPDG方法在路面厚度等于或小于254mm时低估横向和纵向菌株;差异在低于152mm以下的浅层深度方面更显着。因此,基于MEPDG程序的路面厚度设计可以低估薄路面的路面疲劳损坏。加载脉冲周期的不准确计算和负载周期和频率之间的经验转换是在使用电流NCHRP 1-37A时对路面响应的不明预测有效的假设之一。另一方面,示出了3D有限元模型以预测轮胎载荷的路面响应。该模型考虑了测量的轮胎路面接触应力,连续移动轮负载,隐式动态分析和HMA粘弹性特性。发现测量和预测菌株之间的差异在5%以内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号