首页> 外文会议>Engineering Management Conference, 2004. Proceedings >The interplay of modernism, postmodernism and systems engineering
【24h】

The interplay of modernism, postmodernism and systems engineering

机译:现代主义,后现代主义与系统工程的相互作用

获取原文

摘要

Prior to World War 1 the dominant intellectual pattern was characterized by order and grand narratives. The success of the sciences and technology in particular led to this mood. This way of thinking has been called 'modern'. Challenges to 'modern' thought arose through the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics and World War I, which shattered the confidence that European thought and experience was necessarily the highest form towards which all cultures were evolving. The loss of confidence led to existentialist thought and patterns not dependent on the existence of a unitary 'truth'. This intellectual pattern led to the 'postmodern' theoretical framework. In technology the modern era was characterized by the development of mass production methods and the shift to the postmodern experience era from the mass production to the expectation of mass customization. Systems engineering developed as a method to address the management and development of large complex projects and reflected 'modern' thought. This paper explores why methods derived from postmodern theory have failed to assist in the development of socio-technical systems for people living the postmodern experience.
机译:第一次世界大战之前,占主导地位的知识分子模式的特征是秩序和宏大的叙事。科学技术的成功尤其导致了这种情绪。这种思维方式被称为“现代”。相对论和量子力学理论以及第一次世界大战对“现代”思想提出了挑战,这打破了人们对欧洲思想和经验必定是所有文化发展的最高形式的信心。丧失信心导致存在主义思想和模式不依赖于单一“真理”的存在。这种智力模式导致了“后现代”理论框架。在技​​术上,现代时代的特征是大规模生产方法的发展以及从大规模生产到大规模定制的期望向后现代体验时代的转变。开发系统工程是解决大型复杂项目管理和开发的一种方法,并反映了“现代”思想。本文探讨了为什么后现代理论派生的方法未能帮助发展后现代经验的人们发展社会技术系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号