首页> 外文会议>Safety and Reliability >Experience with the use of risk assessment in IMO
【24h】

Experience with the use of risk assessment in IMO

机译:在IMO中使用风险评估的经验

获取原文

摘要

In the maritime industry the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) is the UN organisation responsible for developing international safety and environmental protection regulations. IMO has recently developed the second version of "Guidelines for FSA for use in the IMO rule making process" available as circulars both from the Marine Safety Committee (MSC) and the Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC). This standard is, as far as the author knows, the first risk assessment standard adopted in an UN organisation. As there have been some attempts to develop internationally accepted risk assessment and risk management standards, the paper try to describe some of the experience and lessons learned from implementing FSA in IMO. The work with developing the guidelines is briefly reviewed. Some concepts used in the first version of the guidelines, e.g. the regulatory impact diagram resulted in a lot of controversies, and have subsequently been removed. Similarly the questions of risk acceptance and transparency have been subject to considerable debate and controversy. Paralleling the development of the guidelines there have been a number of applications of the guidelines, recently focusing on bulk carrier safety. Relevant studies have been carried out by UK, by Japan, by Norway and International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), and by International Association of Classification Societies (IACS). These studies will be briefly reviewed with respect to methods used, assumptions made and conclusions drawn. The entire process from the initial terms of reference was formulated by IMO to the final decisions is briefly reviewed. The final decision making took place at the MSC meeting early in December 2002. The main conclusion is that the maritime industry has made a lot of progress, quite fast in the use of risk assessment for use in the decision making process. This being the case, despite the many communication problems that arises in discussing risk issues in international forums. Furthermore, the FSA has helped balancing the often-conflicting interest of the flag states and non-governmental organisations present in IMO.
机译:在海事行业中,国际海运组织(IMO)是联合国联合国组织负责制定国际安全和环境保护法规。 IMO最近开发了“在IMO规则制定过程中使用的FSA指南”的第二版本,作为来自海洋安全委员会(MSC)和海洋环境保护委员会(MEPC)的通函。就作者知道,本标准是联合国组织采用的第一个风险评估标准。由于有一些尝试制定国际公认的风险评估和风险管理标准,该论文试图描述在IMO中实施FSA的一些经验和经验教训。开发指南的工作简要审查。指南的第一个版本中使用的一些概念,例如,监管影响图导致了很多争议,随后已被删除。类似地,风险接受和透明度的问题一直受到相当大的辩论和争议的影响。并行发展指南的发展已有许多申请的指导方针,最近专注于批量载体安全。英国,日本,挪威和国际自由工会联合会(ICFTU)和国际分类协会(IACS)协会,由日本进行了相关研究。将关于所用方法简要审查这些研究,所取得的假设和得出结论。从初始职权范围内的整个过程由IMO向最终决定制定,简要审查。最终决策在2002年12月初的MSC会议上进行。主要结论是,海事行业取得了很大的进展,在使用风险评估时,在决策过程中使用风险评估很快。尽管在国际论坛中讨论风险问题时出现了许多沟通问题,但这是如此。此外,FSA有助于平衡IMO中旗帜国家和非政府组织的经常相互冲突的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号