【24h】

Nonlinguistic Aspects of Linguistic Contexts

机译:语言环境的非语言方面

获取原文

摘要

Our paper works on a proposal recently put forward by Hunter, Asher and Lascarides (2018) on the use of events in discourse context. We basically accept their view and their proposal of using events as explanation in discourse context. However we think that a stricter connection with demonstrations and causal reasoning in everyday conversation is a necessary step in a coherent view of discourse context. We will not deal with any particular formalism, but only with the general problem of taking into account some elements that may simplify or explain what is taken for granted in some steps of our inferences. A central concept used in these setting is the concept of "explanation" as a way to give coherence to the discourse context. This kind of explanation is also based, besides elements of a general encyclopedic knowledge, on default assumptions derived by the ontology present in the lexicon as Asher (2011) has abundantly shown. However, the steps to recover such coherence would gain clarity with a better specification of causal explanation and with a more precise account of the relation between demonstrative and demonstrations in discourse context. On these two aspects we give some suggestions.
机译:我们的论文基于Hunter,Ashe和Lascarides(2018)最近提出的关于在语境中使用事件的提议。我们基本上接受他们的观点和他们在事件语境中使用事件作为解释的建议。但是,我们认为,在日常对话中,与论证和因果推理之间更严格的联系是语篇语境连贯视图中的必要步骤。我们将不会处理任何特定的形式主义,而只会处理一个总的问题,即考虑到一些可能简化或解释我们推论的某些步骤中理所当然的内容的要素。在这些情况下使用的中心概念是“解释”的概念,作为使语篇语境保持连贯的一种方式。除了一般的百科知识的要素之外,这种解释还基于Asher(2011)充分展示了词典中存在的本体论得出的默认假设。但是,通过更好地说明因果关系并更精确地说明话语语境中的指示与示威之间的关系,恢复这种连贯性的步骤将变得更加清晰。在这两个方面,我们提出了一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号