首页> 外文会议>AIAA fluid dynamics conference;AIAA aviation forum >A comparative study of two different methods for RZ axisymmetric coordinates in the context of Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin hydrodynamics
【24h】

A comparative study of two different methods for RZ axisymmetric coordinates in the context of Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin hydrodynamics

机译:拉格朗日间断Galerkin流体力学中RZ轴对称坐标的两种不同方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

We present a comparative study of two different Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin (DG) hydrodynamic methods for compressible flows on unstructured meshes in axisymmetric coordinates. The physical evolution equations for the velocity, and specific total energy are discretized using a modal DG method with linear Taylor series polynomials while the density is advanced by a modal density evolution, which has not been extended to RZ coordinates. Two different approaches are used to discretize the evolution equations ,i.e., the true volume approach and the area-weighted approach. For the true volume approach, the DG equations are derived using on the true 3D volume that is consistent with the geometry conservation law (GCL). A multidirectional approximate Riemann problem at the element surface nodes can be solved using the surface areas in axisymmetric coordinates. This true volume approach conserves mass, momentum, and total energy and satisfies the GCL. However, it can not preserve spherical symmetry on an equal-angle polar grid with 1D radial flows. For the area-weighted approach, the DG equations are based in the 2D Cartesian geometry that is rotated about the axis of symmetry using an element average radius. With this approach, a multidirectional approximate Riemann problem identical to the one in 2D Cartesian geometry can be solved. This area-weighted approach conserves mass, and in the limit of an infinitesimal mesh size, conserves physical momentum, and physical total energy. The area-weighted approach preserves spherical symmetry on an equal-angle polar grid for 1D radial flows, but it does not satisfy the GCL. A suite of test problems are calculated to demonstrate stable mesh motion and the expected second order accuracy of these methods.
机译:我们目前对轴对称坐标中非结构化网格上可压缩流的两种不同拉格朗日不连续伽勒金(DG)流体力学方法进行比较研究。使用具有线性泰勒级数多项式的模态DG方法离散化速度和特定总能量的物理演化方程,同时通过模态密度演化提高密度,该密度尚未扩展到RZ坐标。两种不同的方法用于离散化演化方程,即真实体积方法和面积加权方法。对于真实体积方法,将使用与几何守恒定律(GCL)一致的真实3D体积来推导DG方程。可以使用轴对称坐标中的表面积来解决单元表面节点处的多向近似Riemann问题。这种真正的体积方法可以节省质量,动量和总能量,并满足GCL。但是,它不能在具有一维径向流的等角极性网格上保持球对称性。对于面积加权方法,DG方程基于2D笛卡尔几何,该二维笛卡尔几何使用元素平均半径绕对称轴旋转。通过这种方法,可以解决与二维笛卡尔几何中的一个相同的多方向近似黎曼问题。这种面积加权的方法节省了质量,并且在无限小的网格大小范围内节省了物理动量和物理总能量。对于一维径向流,面积加权方法保留了等角极性网格上的球对称性,但不满足GCL。计算了一组测试问题,以证明这些方法具有稳定的网格运动和预期的二阶精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号