首页> 外文会议>International conference on intelligent tutoring systems >Concept-Based Learning in Blended Environments Using Intelligent Tutoring Systems
【24h】

Concept-Based Learning in Blended Environments Using Intelligent Tutoring Systems

机译:使用智能辅导系统在混合环境中进行基于概念的学习

获取原文

摘要

CoLaB Tutor and AC-ware Tutor are Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) that are based on concept-based learning and are notable due to the fact they are relatively easy to generalize to multiple knowledge domains. In this research study we investigate the performance of CoLaB Tutor, AC-ware Tutor, and Moodle in a blended learning environment for an introductory computer programming course. In our study, regular face-to-face lectures and laboratory exercises were complemented with online learning at the students' own pace, time and location. Our study revealed that CoLaB Tutor students had moderately higher knowledge gains than those students in the AC-ware and Moodle groups. The prediction of student success (pass/fail) for a basic knowledge post-test revealed an overall classification rate of 73,5% for the CoLaB Tutor group (completed knowledge and online score as predictors), 71,4% for the AC-ware group (completed knowledge as predictor) and 70% for the Moodle group (time spent online as predictor). Additionally, students that used ITSs on average passed through more knowledge online than students that used LMS, while students that used LMS on average spent more time online.
机译:Colab导师和AC-Ware导师是智能辅导系统(ITS),其基于基于概念的学习,并且由于它们相对容易地概括到多个知识域来说是值得注意的。在这项研究中,我们研究了Colab导师,AC-Ware导师和Moodle在介绍计算机编程过程中的混合学习环境中的性能。在我们的研究中,定期面对面的讲座和实验室练习在在线学习,在学生自己的速度,时间和地点进行了补充。我们的研究表明,Colab导师的学生比Ac-Ware和Moodle群体中的学生更高的知识涨幅。对基本知识的学生成功(通过/失败)预测测试后,COLAB导师集团的整体分类率为73,5%(完成知识和在线评分为预测因素),ac-的71,4% Mant Group(已完成知识为预测器)和Moodle Group的70%(以预测器为止时的时间)。此外,使用其平均水平的学生通过更多的知识,而不是使用LMS的学生,而使用LMS的学生在线使用LMS更多时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号