首页> 外文会议>Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems >Creative Expert System: Comparison of Proof Searching Strategies
【24h】

Creative Expert System: Comparison of Proof Searching Strategies

机译:创意专家系统:证明搜索策略的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents comparison of time cost of three proof searching strategies in a creative expert system. Initially, model of the creative expert system and inference algorithm are proposed. The algorithm searches for a proof up to a given maximal depth, using one of the following strategies: finding all possible proofs, finding the first proof by depth-first and finding the first proof by breadth-first. Calculation time is measured in inference scenarios from a casting domain. Creativity of the expert system is achieved thanks to integration of inference and machine learning. The learning algorithm can be automatically executed during inference process, because its execution is formalized as a complex inference rule. Such a rule can be fired during inference process. During execution, training data is prepared from facts already stored in the knowledge base and new implications are learned from it. These implications can be used in the inference process. Therefore, it is possible to infer decisions in cases not covered by the knowledge base explicitly.
机译:本文介绍了在创意专家系统中三种证明搜索策略的时间成本比较。最初,提出了创意专家系统的模型和推理算法。该算法使用以下策略之一搜索达到给定最大深度的证明:查找所有可能的证明,按深度优先查找第一个证明并按宽度优先查找第一个证明。计算时间是在来自铸造域的推理方案中测量的。专家系统的创造力得益于推理和机器学习的集成。学习算法可以在推理过程中自动执行,因为它的执行被形式化为复杂的推理规则。这样的规则可以在推理过程中触发。在执行过程中,将从已经存储在知识库中的事实中准备训练数据,并从中学习新的含义。这些含义可以在推理过程中使用。因此,有可能在知识库未明确涵盖的情况下推断决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号