首页> 外文会议>Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society >Use of Muscle Thickness Change to Control Powered Prosthesis: A Pilot Study
【24h】

Use of Muscle Thickness Change to Control Powered Prosthesis: A Pilot Study

机译:使用肌肉厚度变化控制动力假体:试点研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Nowadays, most of the commercial upper-limb externally powered prosthetic devices are controlled by electromyography (EMG) signal. It is detected from the remaining muscles of amputated arms to control the prostheses. However, there are some inherent limitations of EMG control, such as muscle cross talk. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that the muscle thickness change collected by ultrasound during contraction, namely sonomyography (SMG), could be used for muscle assessment and had the potential for prosthetic control. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of controlling a powered prosthesis by one-dimensional SMG (1-D SMG) signal and compared the performances of SMG and EMG control in tracking the guided patterns of wrist extension. SMG and EMG signals, collected from the extensor carpi radialis, were used to control the open-close motion of a powered prosthesis respectively. It was found that the mean RMS tracking errors of SMG control under different movement rates were 12.8±3.2% (mean±SD) and 14.8±4.6% for sinusoidal and square guiding waveforms, respectively, while the corresponding values of EMG control were 24.1±5.0% and 22.9±5.5%, respectively. Paired t-test showed that the RMS errors of SMG control were significantly smaller than those of EMG control. The results suggested that SMG signal, based on further improvement, may have great feasibility to be an alternative method to control prostheses.
机译:如今,大多数商业上肢外部动力假体装置由肌电图(EMG)信号控制。从截肢臂的剩余肌肉检测到控制假体。但是,EMG控制的一些固有局限性,例如肌肉交叉谈话。另一方面,已经证明,在收缩期间通过超声收集的肌厚变化,即神经图(SMG)可用于肌肉评估,并且具有假体控制的可能性。在这项研究中,我们调查了通过一维SMG(1-D SMG)信号控制动力假体的可行性,并比较了SMG和EMG控制的性能,以跟踪手腕延伸的引导图案。从伸肌射线放射线收集的SMG和EMG信号分别用于控制动力假体的开闭运动。结果发现,对于不同运动速率下的SMG控制的平均RMS跟踪误差分别为正弦和方形引导波形的12.8±3.2%(平均值±4.6%,而EMG对照的相应值为24.1±分别为5.0%和22.9±5.5%。配对T检验显示SMG对照的rms误差明显小于EMG控制。结果表明,基于进一步改善的SMG信号可能具有很大的可行性,可以是控制假体的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号