首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Rethinking the relationship between expert and local knowledge: Toward a multi-type approach
【24h】

Rethinking the relationship between expert and local knowledge: Toward a multi-type approach

机译:重新思考专家和地方知识之间的关系:迈向多种途方法

获取原文

摘要

Background: In the environmental health policy-making world of today, the knowledge that serves as a basis for decisions is for the most part expert knowledge held by experts, such as toxicologists and epidemiologists, while local knowledge held by non experts is regarded as its irrelevant opposite. Yet a growing trend among scholars and practitioners questions this approach, for example in the case of health impact assessment (HIA), which values the contribution of local knowledge. Aims: Map different types of knowledge in an HIA stakeholder participation process. portray the multilayered character of the relationship between them. Methods: participant observation of stakeholder participation in HIA. The HIA focused on land usages in the vicinity of a hazardous industry site. Qualitative analysis of 3 observations, 27 interviews, 6 focus groups. Results: The results reaffirm the assumption that the dichotomy between expert and local knowledge, and between those who hold each of them, is artificial. The stakeholders who participated in the HIA held many types of knowledge. Expert knowledge and the methods of acquiring it were not free from ambiguity, uncertainty, and controversy. Its objectivity, sufficiency & truthfulness are questioned. Local knowledge-holders knew about various health hazards, health circumstances & disease trends which were not known to experts. Moreover, each stakeholder held multiple types of knowledge. Finally, the analysis reveals that the expert-local dichotomy serves the existing power relations and creates barriers for meaningful public engagement. Conclusions: This study does not aim to disregard expert knowledge and its value for HIA. Yet, it suggests a more reflexive approach when considering its objectivity, especially in conditions of uncertainty and contested science. Local knowledge has significant contributions to HIA, albeit having its own disadvantages. It provides data on health conditions which is important especially in conditions of limited resources that characterize HIA.
机译:背景:在今天的环境健康决策的世界里,作为决策基础知识是由专家,如毒理学和流行病学举行的大部分专业知识,同时通过非专家认为当地知识被视为其不相干的对面。然而,学者和实践问题中一个日益增长的趋势这种方法,例如在健康影响评估(HIA),其值的当地知识贡献的情况。目标:在HIA利益相关者参与过程地图不同类型的知识。描绘他们之间的关系的多层字符。方法:HIA利益相关者参与的参与观察。该HIA集中在土地用途在危险行业网站的附近。 3层观察,27个访谈,6个焦点小组定性分析。结果:结果重申假设专家和当地知识之间的二分法之间,以及那些谁持有他们每个人的,是人为的。谁参加HIA利益相关者举办多类型的知识。专业知识和获得它的方法是不自由的模糊性,不确定性和争议。它的客观性,充分性和真实性受到质疑。本地知识持有者知道各种健康危险,健康情况和疾病的发展趋势,其不知道专家。此外,每个利益相关者举办多种类型的知识。最后,分析表明,专家本地二分法服务于现有的权力关系和创造有意义的公众参与的障碍。结论:这项研究的目的并不是要忽视专业知识及其HIA价值。然而,它考虑到它的客观性时,尤其是在不确定性和有争议的科学的条件提出了更自反性的做法。当地知识,以HIA显著的贡献,尽管有其自身的缺点。它提供了有关健康状况的数据是重要的,特别是在资源有限表征HIA的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号