首页> 外文会议>ASME annual dynamic systems and control conference >CONTROLLING PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS: HUMANS DO NOT MINIMIZE MUSCLE EFFORT
【24h】

CONTROLLING PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS: HUMANS DO NOT MINIMIZE MUSCLE EFFORT

机译:控制物理相互作用:人类不会最大限度地减少肌肉努力

获取原文

摘要

Physical interaction with tools is ubiquitous in functional activities of daily living. While tool use is considered a hallmark of human behavior, how humans control such physical interactions is still poorly understood. When humans perform a motor task, it is commonly suggested that the central nervous system coordinates the musculo-skeletal system to minimize muscle effort. In this paper, we tested if this notion holds true for motor tasks that involve physical interaction. Specifically, we investigated whether humans minimize muscle forces to control physical interaction with a circular kinematic constraint. Using a simplified arm model, we derived three predictions for how humans should behave if they were minimizing muscular effort to perform the task. First, we predicted that subjects would exert workless, radial forces on the constraint. Second, we predicted that the muscles would be deactivated when they could not contribute to work. Third, we predicted that when moving very slowly along the constraint, the pattern of muscle activity would not differ between clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) motions. To test these predictions, we instructed human subjects to move a robot handle around a virtual, circular constraint at a constant tangential velocity. To reduce the effect of forces that might arise from incomplete compensation of neuro-musculo-skeletal dynamics, the target tangential speed was set to an extremely slow pace (~1 revolution every 13.3 seconds). Ultimately, the results of human experiment did not support the predictions derived from our model of minimizing muscular effort. While subjects did exert workless forces, they did not deactivate muscles as predicted. Furthermore, muscle activation patterns differed between CW and CCW motions about the constraint. These findings demonstrate that minimizing muscle effort is not a significant factor in human performance of this constrained-motion task. Instead, the central nervous system likely prioritizes reducing other costs, such as computational effort, over muscle effort to control physical interactions.
机译:与工具的物理互动在日常生活的功能活动中普遍存在。虽然工具使用被认为是人类行为的标志,但人类如何控制这种身体互动仍然很差。当人类执行电机任务时,通常表明中枢神经系统协调肌肉骨骼系统,以最大限度地减少肌肉努力。在本文中,我们测试了这个概念是否适用于涉及物理交互的电机任务。具体地,我们研究了人类是否最小化肌肉力以控制与圆形运动约束的物理相互作用。使用简化的ARM模型,我们派生了三个预测,因为如果他们最大限度地减少肌肉努力,以便执行任务的肌肉努力。首先,我们预测受试者会对约束作出无效的径向力量。其次,我们预测,当他们无法做出贡献时,肌肉将被停用。第三,我们预测,当沿着约束慢慢移动时,肌肉活动的模式在顺时针(CW)和逆时针(CCW)运动之间不会不同。为了测试这些预测,我们指示人类受试者以恒定的切向速度围绕虚拟,循环约束移动机器人手柄。为了减少可能因神经肌肉骨骼动态的不完全补偿而产生的力的影响,目标切向速度被设定为极其慢的速度(每13.3秒〜1次旋转)。最终,人类实验的结果并不支持我们最小化肌肉努力的模型的预测。虽然受试者确实施加无效的力量,但它们并没有像预测一样停用肌肉。此外,关于约束的CW和CCW运动的肌肉激活模式不同。这些研究结果表明,最小化肌肉努力不是这种受约束运动任务的人类绩效的重要因素。相反,中枢神经系统可能优先考虑降低其他成本,例如计算努力,以控制物理相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号