首页> 外文会议>International Conference on User Science and Engineering >Questionnaire on perception of online collaborative learning: Measuring validity and reliability using rasch model
【24h】

Questionnaire on perception of online collaborative learning: Measuring validity and reliability using rasch model

机译:在线协同学习感知问卷:使用Rasch模型测量有效性和可靠性

获取原文

摘要

This study aims to generate empirical evidence on the validity and reliability of Perception of Online Collaborative Learning Questionnaire (POCLQ) using Rasch model. The questionnaire was distributed to 32 (N=32) Diploma Hotel Catering students from Politeknik Ibrahim Sultan, Johor (PIS). Data obtained was analysed using WINSTEP version 3.68 software. The finding showed that POCLQ had high reliability with five categories of difficulties items. So, it can be concluded that POCLQ is reliable and strongly accepted. Meanwhile, analysis of items fit showed there were six items that are not in the specified range and based on standardised residual correlation measurement value; there were five items found to be overlapped that should be dropped. All the items that needed to be dropped based on the analysis of result had been refined and retained for the purpose of the study and based on expert's view. Therefore, all items remained after Rasch analysis. It is hoped that this study will give emphasis to other researchers about the importance of analysing items to ensure the quality of an instrument being developed.
机译:本研究旨在使用Rasch模型产生关于在线协同学习问卷(POCLQ)的有效性和可靠性的经验证据。调查问卷分发给32(n = 32)文凭咖啡艇学生,从柔佛州的Politeknik Ibrahim Sultan,柔佛州苏丹(PIS)。使用WinStep 3.68版软件分析所获得的数据。该发现表明,POCLQ与五类困难物品具有高可靠性。因此,可以得出结论,POCLQ可靠且强烈接受。同时,对物品的分析表明,有六个项目不在指定范围内,并基于标准化的残余相关测量值;有五个项目被发现重叠,应该被删除。基于对结果分析所需的所有项目都已完善并保留了该研究的目的,并基于专家的观点。因此,Rasch分析后仍保持所有物品。希望本研究能够强调其他研究人员关于分析物品的重要性,以确保正在开发的仪器的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号