首页> 外文会议>European Solid-State Device Research Conference >VPD-DSE-STUDIES OF METAL IMPURITIES ON SILICON: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CONTAMINATION METHODS
【24h】

VPD-DSE-STUDIES OF METAL IMPURITIES ON SILICON: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CONTAMINATION METHODS

机译:硅金属杂质VPD-DSE研究:不同污染方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Combining TXRF (total reflection x-ray fluorescence spectrometry) with VPD-DSE as preconcentration method (vapour phase decomposition-droplet surface etching) improves the detection limits of straight TXRF from E10 atoms/cm2 to the region of E8 atoms/cm2 or below, depending on the wafer diameter. VPD-DSE TXRF can meet the detection limits currently required in the semiconductor industry'. However, a closer look at the method reveals inconsistencies. Previous studies showed the shortcomings of VPD-TXRF caused by variations of the properties of the DSE residue. Others revealed discrepancies between TXRF and AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) due to a calibration difference between film-type and particle-type contaminations in TXRF. This study is a further investigation of factors which cause discrepancies in the results viz. the method of contamination of the sample and the influence of the angle of incidence in TXRF based on the contaminants Mn and Fe. A comparison is also drawn between radiotracer techniques and straight TXRF as analytical methods. Deviations of 20 to 40% between both analytical methods were found.
机译:将TXRF(全反射X射线荧光光谱法)与VPD-DSE相结合作为预浓缩方法(气相分解 - 液滴表面蚀刻)将直接TXRF的检测限改善于E10原子/ cm2到E8原子/ cm2或下方的区域,取决于晶片直径。 VPD-DSE TXRF可以满足半导体行业目前所需的检测限。然而,仔细看看该方法揭示了不一致的。以前的研究表明,VPD-TXRF的缺点是由DSE残留物的性质的变化引起的。其他人由于TXRF中的膜型和颗粒型污染物之间的校准差异而透露了TXRF和AAS(原子吸收光谱法)之间的差异。本研究进一步调查了导致结果差异差异的因素。基于污染物Mn和Fe的TXRF污染方法的污染和影响的影响。在放射性机构技术和直接TXRF之间也绘制了比较作为分析方法。发现两种分析方法之间20%至40%的偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号