首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Fusion >Flexible estimation of risk metric using copula model for the joint severity-frequency loss framework
【24h】

Flexible estimation of risk metric using copula model for the joint severity-frequency loss framework

机译:灵活估计使用Copula模型进行联合严重性频率损失框架的风险度量

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Predictive analytics and data fusion techniques are being regularly used for analysis in Quantitative Risk Management (QRM). The primary risk metric of interest, Value-at-Risk (VaR), has always been difficult to robustly estimate for different data types. The classical Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) approach (denoted henceforth as classical approach) assumes the independence of loss severity and loss frequency. In practice, this assumption may not always hold. To overcome this limitation and more robustly estimate the corresponding VaR, we propose a new approach known as Copula-based Parametric Modeling of Frequency and Severity (CPFS). The proposed approach is verified via large-scale MCS experiments and validated on three publicly available datasets. We compare CPFS with the classical approach and a Data-driven Partitioning of Frequency and Severity (DPFS) approach for robust VaR estimation. We observe that the classical approach estimates VaR poorly while both the DPFS and the CPFS methodologies attain VaR estimates for real-world data. These studies provide real-world evidence that the CPFS and DPFS methodologies have merits for its use to accurately estimate VaR.
机译:预测分析和数据融合技术正在定期用于定量风险管理(QRM)的分析。利息的主要风险度量,值 - 风险(var)始终难以估计不同的数据类型。经典的蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)方法(表示为古典方法)假设损失严重程度和损耗频率的独立性。在实践中,这种假设可能并不总是保持。为了克服这种限制,更加强大地估计相应的VAR,我们提出了一种新的方法,称为基于频率和严重性的基于Copula的参数化建模(CPF)。通过大规模MCS实验验证所提出的方法,并在三个公共可用数据集中验证。我们将CPF与经典方法和频率和严重程度(DPFS)方法进行了经典方法和数据驱动的划分,用于鲁棒VAR估计。我们观察到古典方法估计var差,而DPF和CPFS方法都达到了真实数据的VAR估计。这些研究提供了现实世界的证据,即CPF和DPFS方法有助于准确估计VAR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号