首页> 外文会议>AES international conference >WHAT DID BAIN REALLY SAY? A PRELIMINARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE DISPUTED UTTERANCE BASED ON DATA, ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL MODELS, CALCULATION OF LIKELIHOOD RATIOS, AND TESTING OF VALIDITY
【24h】

WHAT DID BAIN REALLY SAY? A PRELIMINARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE DISPUTED UTTERANCE BASED ON DATA, ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL MODELS, CALCULATION OF LIKELIHOOD RATIOS, AND TESTING OF VALIDITY

机译:贝恩真的怎么说?基于数据,声学分析,统计模型,似然比值的计算和有效性测试的初步争议分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents a preliminary analysis of the disputed utterance in Bain v R [2009] NZSC 16. A likelihood ratio is calculated as a strength-of-evidence statement with respect to the question: What is the probability of getting the acoustic properties of the disputed utterance if Bain had said "I shot the prick" versus if he had said "I can't breathe". In particular, an acoustic and statistical analysis is conducted on the first segment of the second word to estimate the probability of getting the acoustics of this segment if it were a postalveolar fricative versus if it were a palatal fricative. The validity of the system is tested and ways to improve the analysis are discussed.
机译:本文对Bain v R [2009] NZSC 16中有争议的话语进行了初步分析。针对以下问题,似然比作为证据强度陈述而计算:得到该声音的声学特性的概率是多少?贝恩是否曾说过“我打了针”与贝恩说过“我无法呼吸”而对话语提出了异议。尤其是,对第二个单词的第一段进行声学和统计分析,以估计该段是牙槽后摩擦音还是上颚摩擦音的可能性。测试了系统的有效性,并讨论了改善分析的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号