首页> 外文会议>International symposium on transportation and traffic theory >Efficiency and Equity of Ramp Control and Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in a Freeway Corridor
【24h】

Efficiency and Equity of Ramp Control and Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in a Freeway Corridor

机译:高速公路走廊匝道控制及通行能力分配机制的效率与公平性

获取原文

摘要

This paper investigates the efficiency and equity of morning peak ramp control schemes in a freeway corridor with limitedcapacity. In terms of efficiency, both short-run and long-run optimal ramp control schemes are obtained by minimizing the totaltravel cost and maximizing the total social benefit along the corridor. It is found that for a short-run optimum with inelasticdemand, the morning peak period is of the same duration for different on-ramp locations. But for a long-run optimum with elasticdemand, the peak duration for various on-ramps increases with the local capacity elasticity of demand. In terms of equity, twomeasures are defined from a demand-based viewpoint and a space-based viewpoint. It is shown that the short-run optimal rampcontrol scheme is perfectly fair from a demand-based equity viewpoint. Consequently, two typical ramp control schemes—aperfect demand-based equity scheme and a perfect space-based equity scheme—are introduced and compared with the long-runoptimal ramp control scheme in terms of efficiency and equity. It is shown that the long-run optimal ramp control schemewithout an equity constraint is more unfair than the perfect demand-based equity scheme from a space-based equity viewpoint.Numerical simulations using survey data from China suggest that the perfect demand-based equity scheme attains an economicwelfare level that is very close to the optimal one.
机译:本文研究了在有限的高速公路走廊中早晨高峰坡道控制方案的效率和公平性。 容量。在效率方面,通过最小化总和获得短期和长期最佳斜坡控制方案 差旅费用,并最大限度地提高走廊的整体社会效益。发现对于非弹性的短期最优 对于需求,早晨的高峰期对于不同的入口位置具有相同的持续时间。但是对于长期最佳的弹性 需求方面,各种坡道的峰值持续时间随需求的本地容量弹性而增加。就权益而言,两个 措施是从基于需求的观点和基于空间的观点定义的。结果表明,短期最优斜率 从基于需求的权益的角度来看,控制方案是完全公平的。因此,有两种典型的斜坡控制方案: 引入了完善的基于需求的权益计划和完善的基于空间的权益计划,并将其与长期 在效率和公平性方面的最佳斜坡控制方案。结果表明,长期最优的斜坡控制方案 从基于空间的权益的角度来看,没有权益约束的情况比基于需求的完美权益方案更加不公平。 使用来自中国的调查数据进行的数值模拟表明,基于需求的完美股权计划实现了经济 福利水平非常接近最佳水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号