首页> 外文会议>International symposium on transportation and traffic theory >Efficiency and Equity of Ramp Control and Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in a Freeway Corridor
【24h】

Efficiency and Equity of Ramp Control and Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in a Freeway Corridor

机译:高速公路走廊坡道控制和容量分配机制的效率与股权

获取原文

摘要

This paper investigates the efficiency and equity of morning peak ramp control schemes in a freeway corridor with limited capacity. In terms of efficiency, both short-run and long-run optimal ramp control schemes are obtained by minimizing the total travel cost and maximizing the total social benefit along the corridor. It is found that for a short-run optimum with inelastic demand, the morning peak period is of the same duration for different on-ramp locations. But for a long-run optimum with elastic demand, the peak duration for various on-ramps increases with the local capacity elasticity of demand. In terms of equity, two measures are defined from a demand-based viewpoint and a space-based viewpoint. It is shown that the short-run optimal ramp control scheme is perfectly fair from a demand-based equity viewpoint. Consequently, two typical ramp control schemes—a perfect demand-based equity scheme and a perfect space-based equity scheme—are introduced and compared with the long-run optimal ramp control scheme in terms of efficiency and equity. It is shown that the long-run optimal ramp control scheme without an equity constraint is more unfair than the perfect demand-based equity scheme from a space-based equity viewpoint. Numerical simulations using survey data from China suggest that the perfect demand-based equity scheme attains an economic welfare level that is very close to the optimal one.
机译:本文调查了高速公路走廊中早晨峰坡道控制方案的效率和股权,其容量有限。在效率方面,通过最大限度地减少总旅行成本并最大化走廊沿着走廊的总体益处来获得短期和长期最佳斜坡控制方案。结果发现,由于不弹性需求,早晨的峰值时间与不同的斜坡位置的持续时间相同。但对于具有弹性需求的长期最佳,各种斜坡的峰值持续时间随着需求的局部容量弹性而增加。就公平而言,两种措施是根据基于需求的视点和基于空间的视点来定义的。结果表明,从基于需求的股票视点来看,短期最优斜坡控制方案是完全公平的。因此,两个典型的斜坡控制方案 - 一种完善的基于需求的股权方案和完善的基于空间的股权方案 - 在效率和公平方面与长期最优斜坡控制方案进行比较。结果表明,没有股票限制的长期最优斜坡控制方案比来自基于空间的股权观点的完美需求的股权方案更不公平。来自中国的调查数据的数值模拟表明,基于需求的股权方案的完美福利方案达到了非常接近最佳的经济福利水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号