【24h】

Government Control, Debt Maturity Structure and Financial Distress

机译:政府控制,债务期限结构和财务困境

获取原文

摘要

By sampling A-share and non-financial listed firms for the period from year 2004 to 2006 in China, we analyze the relations between debt maturity structure and financial distress to observe whether or not the governance effect of debt financing is effective. The empirical results show that: the more long-term debt as a proportion of total debt, the higher possibility the firms fall into financial distress, and this correlations between them is more obvious when the ultimate controlling shareholder is state owned company and in the area where the government intervention is stronger; in contrast, the more the short term debt debt as a proportion of total debt is, the lower possibility the firm falls into financial distress, however, this correlations is much weaker when the ultimate controlling shareholder is private owned company compared with state owned company. The results indicate that the governance mechanism of short-term debt is more effective than that of long-term debt in China because that government mainly give their influence on the longterm debt, however, the governance effect of short term debt in privated owned companies is much weaker than state owned company because that ultimate controlling shareholder of the private owned company is more likely to tunnel the listed company by means of short term debt since they have no competitive power in competition with state owned companies for long-term loans. Besides, we also find that the possibility to fall into financial distress in state owned companies is significantly lower than private owned companies, which is mainly because of the "helping hand" of government.
机译:通过对2004年至2006年中国A股和非金融上市公司的抽样调查,我们分析了债务期限结构与财务困境之间的关系,以观察债务融资的治理效果是否有效。实证结果表明:长期债务在总债务中所占比例越多,企业陷入财务困境的可能性就越大,当最终控股股东是国有公司且在该地区时,它们之间的这种关联就更加明显。在政府干预较强的地方;相反,短期债务在总债务中所占比例越高,公司陷入财务困境的可能性就越小,但是,与最终国有控股股东相比,当最终控股股东为私人拥有公司时,这种相关性要弱得多。结果表明,在中国,短期债务的治理机制比长期债务的治理机制更有效,因为政府主要对长期债务施加影响,然而,私有公司的短期债务的治理效果是它比国有公司弱得多,因为私有公司的最终控股股东更有可能通过短期债务来挖空上市公司,因为它们没有与国有公司竞争长期贷款的竞争能力。此外,我们还发现,国有企业陷入财务困境的可能性大大低于私营企业,这主要是由于政府的“帮助之手”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号