首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies >A Comparative Analysis of Risk Assessment Methodologies for the Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Risk Assessment Methodologies for the Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide

机译:风险评估方法对二氧化碳地质贮藏的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper offers a broad summary of the most common risk assessment methodologies for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide. We believe it is valuable to compare these methodologies, particularly in the areas where they lead to similar conclusions. The objective of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the current similarities and differences of these proposed methodologies. Since CCS was proposed as a mitigation option for reducing anthropogenic CO_2 emissions, several attempts have been made to study the potential risks of long-term storage of CO_2 in geological formations. Various worldwide projects have tried different industrial methods adapted to GSC. In spite of these efforts, currently there is no standardised method or set of methods for evaluating risk and/or uncertainty for GSC projects. Application or adaptation of advanced industrial quantitative risk assessment methods seems not convenient at this point because of lack of specific data. The development of frameworks and qualitative methods looks the most trustable for current projects.
机译:本文提供了广泛的概要,用于二氧化碳的地质储存最常见的风险评估方法。我们认为,比较这些方法,特别是在他们导致类似结论的地区是有价值的。本文的目的是提供更好地理解这些提出的方法的当前相似性和差异。由于CCS被提出为减少人为CO_2排放的缓解选择,因​​此已经进行了几次尝试,以研究地质形成中CO_2长期储存的潜在风险。各种全球项目尝试了适用于GSC的不同工业方法。尽管有了这些努力,目前没有标准化的方法或用于评估GSC项目的风险和/或不确定性的方法。应用或适应先进的工业定量风险评估方法由于缺乏特定数据,这一点似乎不方便。框架和定性方法的发展看起来对当前项目最值得信赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号