首页> 外文会议>Advances in Artificial Intelligence >Two Set-Theoretic Approaches to the Semantics of Adjective-Noun Combinations
【24h】

Two Set-Theoretic Approaches to the Semantics of Adjective-Noun Combinations

机译:形容词-名词组合语义的两种集合论方法

获取原文

摘要

Despite their simple syntactic form, adjective-noun combinations seem to have no straightforward semantic method that parallels the simplicity of the syntax. Conventionally, adjectives are to blame for this behaviour. Such a belief has culminated in the generally accepted view that adjectives should be semantically analyzed as belonging to a hierarchy of the following structure: 1. Intersective e.g. red as in That is a red rose 2. Subsective: 2.1 Subsective-only e.g. veteran as in John is a veteran soldier 2.2 Double or "doublet" e.g. beautiful as in Maria is a beautiful dancer 3. Non-subsective: 3.1 Non-privative e.g. potential as in John is a potential candidate 3.2 Privative e.g. fafe as in That is a fake gun .
机译:尽管它们的句法形式很简单,但形容词-名词组合似乎没有与语法简单性相似的直接语义方法。按照惯例,形容词应归咎于这种行为。这种信念在普遍接受的观点中达到了顶点,该观点认为形容词应该在语义上被分析为属于以下结构的层次结构:1.相交的,例如相交的。红色,如那是一朵红玫瑰2。细分:2.1仅细分,例如像约翰一样的退伍军人是退伍军人。2.2 Double或“ doublet”,例如像玛丽亚一样美丽,是一位漂亮的舞者。3非主观:3.1非主观,例如像约翰一样的潜力是潜在的候选者3.2专有权如那是假枪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号