【24h】

The Epa In Transition

机译:转型中的Epa

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In order for you to understand the motivation behind some of my comments, I thought it would help if I started with a statement of RadTech's basic approach to the EPA. In response to the first Clean Air Act of 1970, much of the drive behind the early development of the UV/EB technology has been to reduce VOCs. The use of this technology in the industrial world has been slow to develop. Surprisingly, much of the early growth we have seen has been due to beneficial factors of the technology other than environmental control. However, high solids and water-borne systems were adequate to meet early VOC restrictions and they were readily accepted by the controlled industries because they required only minor chages in processing. Because they did not encounter many UV/EB installations in the industries they surveyed, the EPA did not recognize the value of UV/EB technology in providing for umch greater reductions in VOC.
机译:为了让您理解我的一些评论背后的动机,我认为如果我先从RadTech对EPA的基本方法的陈述开始,那将会有所帮助。为了响应1970年的第一部《清洁空气法》,早期开发UV / EB技术的主要动力是减少VOC。在工业界中该技术的使用发展缓慢。令人惊讶的是,我们看到的许多早期增长都是由于该技术的有益因素,而不是环境控制。但是,高固体含量和水基体系足以满足早期VOC的限制,并且由于在处理过程中只需要很小的费用,它们就容易被受控行业接受。由于他们在所调查的行业中没有遇到过许多UV / EB装置,因此EPA并未意识到UV /​​ EB技术在大幅降低VOC方面的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号