首页> 外文会议>Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists >FARMING SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO NITROGEN
【24h】

FARMING SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO NITROGEN

机译:耕作制度及其对甘蔗对氮的反应的影响

获取原文

摘要

The Australian sugarcane industry is under increasing pressure to minimise losses of nutrients from the field. Inputs need to be precisely matched to crop requirements. A trial was established at Mackay to determine whether nitrogen (N) rates could be reduced following long-term green-cane trash blanketing (GCTB) and to test whether current recommendations for new farming systems were robust. Four farming system treatments were established: (B) Long-term burnt trash, 1.5 m single rows, bare fallow, conventional cultivation; (GC) Long-term GCTB, 1.5 m single rows, bare fallow, conventional cultivation; (NFSS) 1.8 m single rows, soybean fallow, pre-formed beds, GCTB; (NFSD) 1.8 m dual rows, soybean fallow, pre-formed beds, GCTB. B and GC were possible as the trial was located on a site that was set-up in 1992 to investigate GCTB and the trash treatments had been maintained. Within each farming system treatment four N rates were applied (0, 75, 150 and 225 kg N/ha). Response to N was similar for the B and GC systems. This suggests that, at this stage, N rates cannot be reduced following long-term GCTB. It is possible that soil carbon and N may not be accumulating as predicted under the GCTB system. A 4 t/ha soybean fallow crop appeared to contribute little N to the following plant cane crop as the NFSS and NFSD systems responded in a similar manner to N as the B and GC systems. The soybean fallow crop was defoliated by an insect pest which may have impacted on the amount of N returned to the soil. Current recommendations for N to be applied to plant cane following poor soybean crops appear justified. Similar yields were achieved with all farming systems. Relatively high rainfall during the study period may have negated the soil moisture conservation benefit from a GCTB system. At this stage, the benefit of new farming systems appears to be a lower cost of production. Improvements to soil health reported elsewhere will hopefully also result in increased production in the future.
机译:澳大利亚甘蔗业承受着越来越大的压力,要求尽量减少田间养分的流失。投入必须与作物需求精确匹配。在Mackay进行了一项试验,以确定长期绿甘蔗垃圾掩盖(GCTB)后是否可以降低氮(N)含量,并测试当前对新农业系统的建议是否有效。建立了四种耕作制度处理方法:(B)长期焚烧垃圾,1.5 m单行,裸露的休耕地,常规耕作; (GC)长期GCTB,单行1.5 m,裸地,常规种植; (NFSS)1.8 m单行,大豆休耕地,预制床,GCTB; (NFSD)1.8 m双排,大豆休闲地,预制床,GCTB。由于该试验位于1992年建立的调查GCTB的地点,并且垃圾处理得以维持,因此B和GC成为可能。在每个耕作系统中,施用了四个氮肥(0、75、150和225 kg N / ha)。 B和GC系统对N的响应相似。这表明,在此阶段,长期使用GCTB后无法降低氮的利用率。在GCTB系统下,土壤中的碳和N可能没有积累。 4吨/公顷的大豆休闲作物似乎对接下来的甘蔗作物贡献很少的氮,因为NFSS和NFSD系统对氮的响应方式与B和GC系统相似。大豆休闲作物因害虫而落叶,这可能会影响返回土壤的氮含量。大豆作物歉收后,目前建议将氮用于植物甘蔗的建议是合理的。所有耕作系统均实现了相似的产量。在研究期间相对较高的降雨可能抵消了GCTB系统对土壤水分保持的好处。在这个阶段,新的耕作制度的好处似乎是降低了生产成本。希望其他地方报告的土壤健康改善也将导致未来产量增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号