首页> 外文会议>Annual Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference >FARMING SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO NITROGEN
【24h】

FARMING SYSTEMS AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO NITROGEN

机译:农业系统及其对甘蔗对氮的影响的影响

获取原文

摘要

The Australian sugarcane industry is under increasing pressure to minimise losses of nutrients from the field. Inputs need to be precisely matched to crop requirements. A trial was established at Mackay to determine whether nitrogen (N) rates could bereduced following long-term green-cane trash blanketing (GCTB) and to test whether current recommendations for new farming systems were robust. Four farming system treatments were established: (B) Long-term burnt trash, 1.5 m single rows, bare fallow, conventional cultivation; (GC) Long-term GCTB, 1.5 m single rows, bare fallow, conventional cultivation; (NFSS) 1.8 m single rows, soybean fallow, pre-formed beds, GCTB; (NFSD) 1.8 m dual rows, soybean fallow, pre-formed beds, GCTB. B and GC were possibleas the trial was located on a site that was set-up in 1992 to investigate GCTB and the trash treatments had been maintained. Within each farming system treatment four N rates were applied (0, 75, 150 and 225 kg N/ha). Response to N was similar for the Band GC systems. This suggests that, at this stage, N rates cannot be reduced following long-term GCTB. It is possible that soil carbon and N may not be accumulating as predicted under the GCTB system. A 4 t/ha soybean fallow crop appeared to contributelittle N to the following plant cane crop as the NFSS and NFSD systems responded in a similar manner to N as the B and GC systems. The soybean fallow crop was defoliated by an insect pest which may have impacted on the amount of N returned to the soil. Current recommendations for N to be applied to plant cane following poor soybean crops appear justified. Similar yields were achieved with all farming systems. Relatively high rainfall during the study period may have negated the soil moisture conservation benefit from a GCTB system. At this stage, the benefit of new farming systems appears to be a lower cost of production. Improvements to soil health reported elsewhere will hopefully also result in increased production in the future.
机译:澳大利亚甘蔗产业正在增加压力,以尽量减少现场的营养损失。输入需要精确匹配以裁剪要求。在Mackay在Mackay建立了试验,以确定氮气(n)率是否可以在长期的绿色甘蔗垃圾覆盖(GCTB)之后被拘留,并测试新农业系统的当前建议是否具有强大。建立了四种农业系统治疗方法:(b)长期烧焦垃圾,1.5米单行,裸露的休耕,常规栽培; (GC)长期GCTB,1.5米单行,裸露休耕,常规栽培; (NFSS)1.8米单行,大豆休耕,预成型床,GCTB; (NFSD)1.8米双排,大豆休耕,预成型床,GCTB。 B和GC是Possibleas,试验位于1992年建立的网站上,以调查GCTB,并保持垃圾处理。在每个农业系统中,施加四个N个速率(0,75,150和225 kg n / ha)。对于频带GC系统,对n的响应类似。这表明,在这个阶段,在长期GCTB之后,N个税率不能减少。土壤碳和n可能不会在GCTB系统下预测的情况下累积。由于NFSS和NFSD系统以与B和GC系统类似的方式响应NFSS和NFSD系统,似乎为下列植物CANE作物提供了4 T / HA大豆休耕作物。大豆休耕作物被昆虫害虫脱落,昆虫害虫可能影响返回土壤的N的量。在贫瘠的大豆作物之后,N适用于植物蔗科的目前的建议似乎是合理的。所有耕作系统都实现了类似的产率。在研究期间的降雨量相对较高可能会使土壤水分保护受益于GCTB系统。在这个阶段,新农业系统的好处似乎是较低的生产成本。在其他地方报告的土壤健康的改善有望在未来也会导致产量增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号