首页> 外文会议> >Comparison of patterned wafer defect detection tools for general in-line monitors
【24h】

Comparison of patterned wafer defect detection tools for general in-line monitors

机译:常规在线监测仪的图案化晶圆缺陷检测工具的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Manufacturer specifications for sensitivity and capture efficiency for pattern wafer defect inspection tools are usually based on data obtained under optimum conditions, using substrates with little process variation, and in some cases long inspection times. Requirements for general in-line monitors at most IC production facilities do not require maximum sensitivity. Key requirements at Motorola MOS 12 for general in-line monitors, when there is no previously identified defect type that must be detected, are zero nuisance defects, significant sample size, and reasonable speed and sensitivity. At startup of Motorola MOS 12, three types of pattern wafer defect inspection tools were purchased: KLA 2131, OSI 165, and Tencor 7600. This paper outlines the results of a study comparing defect detection sensitivity and capture rate for the three systems, given our requirements for general in-line monitors. Results from six steps in our process will be presented. This data was used, in part, to develop our strategy for in-line defect monitoring.
机译:图案晶片缺陷检查工具的灵敏度和捕获效率的制造商规格通常基于在最佳条件下获得的数据,所使用的基板工艺变化很小,并且在某些情况下检查时间较长。大多数IC生产设施对通用在线监视器的要求都不需要最大的灵敏度。如果没有以前必须确定的缺陷类型,则对于常规在线监测器,Motorola MOS 12的关键要求是零缺陷,显着的样本量以及合理的速度和灵敏度。在启动Motorola MOS 12时,购买了三种类型的图案晶片缺陷检查工具:KLA 2131,OSI 165和Tencor7600。本文概述了比较这三种系统的缺陷检测灵敏度和捕获率的研究结果。常规在线监控器的要求。我们将介绍过程中六个步骤的结果。此数据部分地用于开发我们的在线缺陷监控策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号