首页> 外文会议>Knowledge representation for health-care : Data, processes and guidelines >Identifying Disease-Centric Subdomains in Very Large Medical Ontologies:A Case-Study on Breast Cancer Concepts in SNOMED CT.Or: Finding 2500 Out of 300.000
【24h】

Identifying Disease-Centric Subdomains in Very Large Medical Ontologies:A Case-Study on Breast Cancer Concepts in SNOMED CT.Or: Finding 2500 Out of 300.000

机译:识别大型医学本体中以疾病为中心的子域:SNOMED CT中乳腺癌概念的案例研究或:从300.000中发现2500

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Modern medical vocabularies can contain up to hundreds of thousands of concepts. In any particular use-case only a small fraction of these will be needed. In this paper we first define two notions of a disease-centric subdomain of a large ontology. We then explore two methods for identifying disease-centric subdomains of such large medical vocabularies. The first method is based on lexically querying the ontology with an iteratively extended set of seed queries. The second method is based on manual mapping between concepts from a medical guideline document and ontology concepts. Both methods include concept-expansion over subsumption and equality relations. We use both methods to determine a breast-cancer-centric subdomain of the SNOMED CT ontology. Our experiments show that the two methods produce a considerable overlap, but they also yield a large degree of complementarity, with interesting differences between the sets of concepts that they return. Analysis of the results reveals strengths and weaknesses of the different methods.
机译:现代医学词汇可以包含多达数十万个概念。在任何特定用例中,只需要其中的一小部分。在本文中,我们首先定义大型本体的以疾病为中心的子域的两个概念。然后,我们探索两种方法来识别这种大型医学词汇的以疾病为中心的子域。第一种方法是基于用迭代扩展的种子查询集词法查询本体。第二种方法基于医学指南文档中的概念与本体概念之间的手动映射。两种方法都包括对包含和平等关系的概念扩展。我们使用两种方法来确定SNOMED CT本体论的以乳腺癌为中心的子域。我们的实验表明,这两种方法产生了相当大的重叠,但它们也产生了很大程度的互补性,它们返回的概念集之间存在有趣的差异。对结果的分析揭示了不同方法的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号