首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports vol.2; 20050822-27; Beijing(CN) >THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUSCLE FORCES AND EMG PARAMETERS IN TWO FORMS OF THE STRENGTH TRAINING
【24h】

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUSCLE FORCES AND EMG PARAMETERS IN TWO FORMS OF THE STRENGTH TRAINING

机译:两次力量训练中肌肉力量和肌电参数的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Based on the facts that we can conclude: 1) There were no significant differences of the force parameters between "continuous repetition MVC" and "interval repetition MVC" in the static condition, but very significant differences in dynamic condition (p < 0.01). Thus the dynamic training form of "continuous repetition MVC" is preferable to that of "interval repetition MVC" in improving the start strength, and vice versa in improving the maximal strength and the explosive strength. 2) Despite of the difference of conditions tested, any individual's muscles were activated in similar orders corresponding to the forms of "continuous repetition MVC" and "interval repetition MVC", but even in same form of action a significant person-to-person difference was found in the muscular patterns. 3) Comparing "continuous repetition MVC" with "interval repetition MVC", there was no significant difference in the myoelectric activity level of the muscles on a whole in static condition, but a significant difference in dynamic condition (p < 0.05). The myoelectric activity level of the muscles during "interval repetition MVC" was far lower than that during "continuous repetition MVC". 4) On both forms of "continuous repetition MVC" and "interval repetition MVC", the correlation degree of EMG-force is almost medium to low. Considering all the factors that may disturb the myoelectric changes, it is not adoptable and also not scientific that the muscular force was statistically predicted from EMG parameters at present.
机译:根据我们可以得出的结论:1)在静态条件下,“连续重复MVC”和“间隔重复MVC”之间的力参数没有显着差异,而在动态条件下则存在非常显着的差异(p <0.01)。因此,“连续重复MVC”的动态训练形式在提高起始强度方面优于“间隔重复MVC”,而在提高最大强度和爆炸强度方面则相反。 2)尽管所测试的条件有所不同,但任何人的肌肉都以类似于“连续重复MVC”和“间隔重复MVC”形式的顺序被激活,但是即使以相同的动作形式,人与人之间也存在显着差异被发现在肌肉模式。 3)将“连续重复MVC”与“间隔重复MVC”进行比较,在静态下整体上肌肉的肌电活动水平没有显着差异,而在动态条件下则有显着差异(p <0.05)。 “间隔重复MVC”期间肌肉的肌电活动水平远低于“连续重复MVC”期间肌肉的电活动水平。 4)在“连续重复MVC”和“间隔重复MVC”这两种形式中,EMG力的相关程度几乎为中到低。考虑到可能干扰肌电变化的所有因素,目前不能根据肌电参数从统计学上预测肌力是不可接受的,也不科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号