首页> 外文会议>IMEKO world congress on metrology in the 3rd millennium >COMPARISON OF EMISSIVITY MEASUREMENTS USING ANINTEGRATING SPHERE REFLECTOMETER AND A LASER POLARIMETERON SURFACES WITH VARIOUS DEGREES OF ROUGHNESS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF EMISSIVITY MEASUREMENTS USING ANINTEGRATING SPHERE REFLECTOMETER AND A LASER POLARIMETERON SURFACES WITH VARIOUS DEGREES OF ROUGHNESS

机译:用粗糙度不同的积分球面反射仪和激光极化仪表面进行发射率测量的比较。

获取原文

摘要

Laser polarimetry has been used for years toobtain normal spectral emissivity measurements on pulseheatedmaterials [1, 2]. The method is based on theFRESNEL equations that describe reflection and refractionat an ideally smooth interface between two isotropic media.However, polarimetry is frequently used with surfaces thatclearly deviate from this ideal condition. Questions arisewith respect to the applicability of the simple FRESNELequations to non-specularly reflecting surfaces. On the otherhand, reflectometry utilizing integrating spheres provides ameasurement of the hemispherical spectral reflectance fornormal incidence, from which the normal spectralemissivity1 can be derived, regardless of surface texture. In afirst effort to explore the limits of polarimetry in terms ofsurface roughness, room temperature measurements wereperformed on a number of samples using both an integratingsphere reflectometer and a laser polarimeter. In this paper,the two methods are briefly described and the results of thecomparison are discussed.
机译:激光偏振法已经使用了多年,以在脉冲加热的材料上获得正常的光谱发射率测量值[1,2]。该方法基于FRESNEL方程,该方程描述了两种各向同性介质之间理想光滑界面上的反射和折射。但是,偏振法经常用于明显偏离该理想条件的表面。有关简单FRESNEL方程在非镜面反射表面上的适用性出现了一些问题。另一方面,利用积分球的反射法可以测量法向入射的半球光谱反射率,无论表面纹理如何,都可以从中得出法向光谱发射率1。为了探索偏振法在表面粗糙度方面的局限性,使用积分球反射仪和激光偏振仪对许多样品进行了室温测量。本文简要介绍了这两种方法,并讨论了比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号