首页> 外文会议>IEEE Workshop on Augmented and Virtual Realities for Good >VR and Empathy: The Bad, the Good, and the Paradoxical
【24h】

VR and Empathy: The Bad, the Good, and the Paradoxical

机译:VR与移情:坏,善与悖论

获取原文

摘要

Virtual reality (VR) is cited as offering the ultimate empathy machine [31]. This theory makes sense intuitively since VR enables a user to step in to another's shoes and experience the world as they do. We define this specific class of mental state as `emotional empathy' [49].The ability of VR to evoke emotional empathy is widely lauded as a good thing [18], [35], [43]. In this paper we invite labels such as `Luddites' and `technophobes' as we question the soundness of such claims. We instead offer warnings regarding employing VR is this manner and urge caution. Rather than dismiss the usefulness of VR in this realm we offer alternative implementation techniques in order to evoke more positive results in users.VR offers much utility for psychologists, psychiatrists, and neu-roscientists due to the ability it affords to alter cognition. While promoting the medium in general, we offer warnings regarding potential short and long term neurological impacts. We encourage increased research focus on the underlying neural mechanisms that underpin VR's successful multisensory hijack.
机译:虚拟现实(VR)被认为提供了最终的移情机器[31]。由于VR使用户能够穿上另一双鞋并像他们一样体验世界,因此该理论在直觉上是有意义的。我们将这种特定的精神状态定义为“情感共情” [49]。VR引起情感共情的能力被广泛赞誉为好事物[18],[35],[43]。在本文中,当我们质疑这种说法的合理性时,我们邀请诸如“ Luddites”和“ technophobes”之类的标签。相反,我们会以这种方式提供警告,建议您使用VR。为了提供更积极的结果,我们没有替代VR在这个领域的作用,而是提供了替代的实现技术。由于VR具有改变认知的能力,因此它为心理学家,精神病学家和神经科学家提供了很多实用工具。在总体上推广该媒介的同时,我们会提供有关潜在的短期和长期神经系统影响的警告。我们鼓励越来越多的研究重点放在支持VR成功实现多感官劫持的潜在神经机制上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号