首页> 外文会议>Humanity, science, technology: The systemic foundations of the information age >A SELF-REFERENTIAL EPISTEMOLOGY:BEYOND CIRCULARITY TO RIGOR
【24h】

A SELF-REFERENTIAL EPISTEMOLOGY:BEYOND CIRCULARITY TO RIGOR

机译:自我参照的流行病学:超越严格的循环

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Natural epistemology is a necessary consequence in any theory that denies a priorirnassumptions. Any assumption utilized in such an epistemology is recognized as being (a)rnthe at-one-time hypothesis of someone (b) that has been tested and (c) has been found tornbe reliable. In a systemic, evolutionary account of the social world, the norms forrnjudging a theory’s validity have to self-consciously reflect the evolutionary processes thatrngenerate those norms.rnThis paper relies heavily on the thoughts of Luhmann, Goertzel, Maturana, Varela,rnKampis, Artigiani, Treumann, Habermas, and Warfield It develops several aspects of arnself-referential epistemology. It examines relationships with the naturalized and socialrnepistemologies that are derived from Quine. It considers the hermeneutic circle and thernways it is expanded. It describes the roles of redundancy and asymmetry. It explains thernautopoiesis of knowledge in terms of the cognitive equation. It portrays the surprisingrnvalidation of deterministic science that is offered by deterministic chaos theory.rnThe key ideas of epistemological rigor are derived from Luhmann and Warfield. Therncriteria for evaluating statements and belief systems are mined from a variety of systemicrnauthors.
机译:在任何否认先验假设的理论中,自然认识论都是必然的结果。在这种认识论中使用的任何假设都被认为是(a)某人(b)经过测试并且(c)被发现可靠的一次性假设。在对社会世界进行系统的,进化的解释时,判断一个理论有效性的准则必须自觉地反映出产生这些准则的进化过程。本文高度依赖于卢曼,戈特策尔,曼图拉那,瓦雷拉,坎普斯,阿尔蒂吉尼,特劳曼,哈贝马斯和战地(Warfield)它发展了知识自我指称认识论的几个方面。它检查了与来自Quine的自然和社会流行病学的关系。它考虑了诠释学圈,并且一直在扩展。它描述了冗余和不对称的作用。它用认知方程式解释了知识的自动生成。它描绘了确定性混沌理论所提供的对确定性科学的令人惊讶的验证。认识论严谨性的关键思想来自卢曼和沃菲尔德。评估陈述和信念系统的标准是从各种各样的系统作者中提取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号