首页> 外文会议>Global challenges technology integration >Incremental Recovery Using Dual-CompletedWells in Gas Reservoirs With Bottom WaterDrive: A Feasibility Study
【24h】

Incremental Recovery Using Dual-CompletedWells in Gas Reservoirs With Bottom WaterDrive: A Feasibility Study

机译:在具有底水驱动装置的气藏中使用双完井提高采收率的可行性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Water drive reduces gas recovery though themechanism of water coning that results in liquid loadingand killing the wells. Installation at a Downhole GasWater Separator (DGWS) in the well may prevent theliquid loading. The paper presents another solution tothis problem - a dual-completed well with downholewater sink (DWS) drainage and injection installation.DWS wells are different from the DGWS wells byinclusion of a second bottom completion that controlswater outside the well and prevents commingled inflow ofgas and water to the top completion. The wells have beensuccessfully tested in oil reservoirs.The study qualifies DWS concept for gas wells bycomparing simulated performances of a conventionalwell, and a DWS well. The simulation runs were madeover a broad range of the initial reservoir pressure and permeability values for a gas reservoir with largeassociated aquifer. Also included is a comparisonbetween DGWS and DWS wells for selected conditions.The results show considerable advantage of dualcompletion over conventional wells in low-pressure(subnormal) tight (1 md) reservoirs – a 2.6 - foldrecovery increase before killing the well with water. Theadvantage, however, reduces to 10% for reservoir withnormal pore pressure gradient and permeability 10 md.When compared to DGWS wells, the final gas recovery ofDWS wells is the same, but DWS produces all the gas35% sooner than DGWS. The study also identified thebest DWS completion design where the top completion isused only for gas production, and the bottom completionfor inverse gas coning, gravity separation and waterinjection.
机译:通过水锥进的机理,水驱降低了气体的回收,从而导致液体的装载和压井。在井中的井下气水分离器(DGWS)上安装可能会阻止液体加载。本文提出了解决该问题的另一种解决方案-带有井下水槽(DWS)排水和注入装置的双完井井.DWS井与DGWS井的不同之处在于,它包括第二个底部完井装置,可控制井外水并防止天然气和水混合流入至最高完成。通过比较常规井和DWS井的模拟性能,该研究证明了DWS气井的概念是合格的。对大型伴生含水层的气藏,在广泛的储层初始压力和渗透率值范围内进行了模拟运行。 DGWS和DWS井在选定条件下的比较也包括在内。结果显示,在低压(低于正常压力)致密(1 md)储层中,双完井技术比常规井具有相当大的优势-在用水杀死井之前,采收率提高了2.6倍。但是,正常孔隙压力梯度和渗透率为10 md的储层的优势降低到10%。与DGWS井相比,DWS井的最终天然气采收率是相同的,但DWS比DGWS快了35%。该研究还确定了最佳的DWS完井设计,其中顶部完井仅用于天然气生产,底部完井用于反气锥,重力分离和注水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号