首页> 外文会议>ASME/ASCE/IEEE joint rail conference 2011 >HIGH SPEED RAIL: TRACK CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
【24h】

HIGH SPEED RAIL: TRACK CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS

机译:高速铁路:履带施工注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper discusses general High Speed Rail (HSR) track geometry, construction and maintenance practices and tolerances. The discussion will reference several key international projects and highlight different construction methods and the track geometry assessments used to establish and ensure serviceability of a typical HSR system. Historically, established tighter tolerances of "Express" HSR (i.e. operating speeds greater than 240 km/h or 150 mph) systems have favored the use of slab track systems over ballasted track systems. Slab track systems offer greater inherent stability while ballasted track systems generally require more frequent track geometry assessments and anomaly-correcting surfacing operations. The decisions related to which system to use for a given application involve numerous considerations discussed only briefly in this paper. In many cases, the optimal solution may include both track forms. Rolling stock considerations and their influence on track infrastructure design are considered beyond the scope of this paper. This paper will focus predominantly on two slab track systems widely used in international HSR projects: the Japanese J-slab track system; and the German Rheda slab track system. The French track system will be referenced as the typical ballasted track HSR design. The practices discussed in this paper generally apply to systems which are either primarily or exclusively passenger rail systems. In the U.S., these types of systems will necessarily exclude the systems the Federal Railway Administration (FRA) refers to as "Emerging" or "Regional" HSR systems which include passenger train traffic to share trackage on, what are otherwise considered, primarily freight lines.
机译:本文讨论了普通高铁(HSR)轨道的几何形状,构造和维护实践以及公差。讨论将参考几个关键的国际项目,并重点介绍用于建立并确保典型高铁系统的可维护性的不同施工方法和轨道几何形状评估。从历史上看,已建立的“快速”高铁(例如,运行速度大于240 km / h或150 mph)的更严格的容差比平板式轨道系统更倾向于使用平板轨道系统。平板轨道系统具有更高的固有稳定性,而压载轨道系统通常需要更频繁的轨道几何形状评估和异常校正堆焊操作。与给定应用程序使用哪个系统有关的决定涉及众多考虑因素,本文仅作简要讨论。在许多情况下,最佳解决方案可能包括两种轨道形式。机车车辆的考虑因素及其对轨道基础设施设计的影响不在本文讨论范围之内。本文将主要关注国际高铁项目中广泛使用的两种平板轨道系统:日本的J平板轨道系统;以及德国Rheda平板轨道系统。法国轨道系统将被视为典型的压载轨道高铁设计。本文讨论的实践通常适用于主要或专门用于客运铁路系统的系统。在美国,这些类型的系统将必然排除联邦铁路管理局(FRA)称为“新兴”或“区域”高铁系统的系统,其中包括旅客列车交通以共享追踪,否则会被认为主要是货运线路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号