【24h】

FRACTURE MARGINS FOR GROWING CRACKS IN WELD REPAIRS

机译:焊缝裂纹增加的断裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The residual stress field around a single-pass weld filling a slit in a thin rectangular plate has been simulated using both 2D ABAQUS and 3D SYSWELD finite element models, with good agreement between the two codes. Through-wall cracks of varying lengths have been inserted into the plate along the weld centre-line, and the non-linear crack driving force due to residual stress evaluated using three formulations of the J-integral: the standard ABAQUS J, the G-theta approach coded into SYSWELD, and a modified J-integral, J_(mod), that retains its path independence under non-proportional loading. Cracks were introduced into the FE meshes either simultaneously (all crack flank nodes released in the same step) or progressively (crack opened in small increments from mid-length to tip). The results were compared with crack driving force estimates made using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) and the R6 procedure. The crack driving forces predicted by all three J-formulations agree well for simultaneous opening, showing that the crack driving force rises to a peak for a crack length equal to the weld length, and falls for longer cracks. Linear elastic fracture mechanics gives a good estimate of the crack driving force for very short defects (confirming the absence of elastic follow up), but is conservative for longer defects, overestimating the peak driving force by 20%. The R6 estimates, which incorporate plasticity corrections, are more conservative than LEFM, overestimating the peak crack driving force by up to 60%. The crack driving force for a progressively opened crack is much lower than for simultaneous opening, indicating that there may be considerable excess pessimism in conventional assessments of defects of this type.
机译:已使用2D ABAQUS和3D SYSWELD有限元模型模拟了填充薄矩形板中缝隙的单道焊缝周围的残余应力场,并且两个代码之间具有很好的一致性。沿焊接中心线将不同长度的通孔裂缝插入板中,并使用三种J积分公式评估了残余应力引起的非线性裂纹驱动力:标准ABAQUS J,G- theta方法被编码为SYSWELD,并且其修改后的J积分J_(mod)在非比例加载下保持其路径独立性。将裂纹同时(在同一步骤中释放所有裂纹侧面节点)或逐渐地(裂纹从中等长度到尖端以较小的增量打开)引入到有限元网格中。将结果与使用线性弹性断裂力学(LEFM)和R6程序得出的裂纹驱动力估算值进行了比较。由所有三个J公式预测的裂纹驱动力非常适合同时打开,这表明对于等于焊接长度的裂纹长度,裂纹驱动力上升到峰值,而对于更长的裂纹,裂纹驱动力下降。线性弹性断裂力学可以很好地估计非常短的缺陷的裂纹驱动力(确认没有弹性随动),但是对于较长的缺陷则比较保守,将峰值驱动力高估了20%。 R6估计值包含可塑性校正,比LEFM更为保守,将峰值裂纹驱动力高估了60%。逐渐打开的裂纹的裂纹驱动力比同时打开的裂纹的驱动力要低得多,这表明在传统的这类缺陷评估中可能存在相当大的悲观情绪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号