首页> 外文会议>Air & Waste Management Association's annual conference & exhibition;A&WMA's annual conference & exhibition >Evaluation of the AERMOD Dispersion Model as aFunction of Atmospheric Stability for an Urban Area
【24h】

Evaluation of the AERMOD Dispersion Model as aFunction of Atmospheric Stability for an Urban Area

机译:AERMOD色散模型作为城市大气稳定性的函数的评估

获取原文

摘要

The AERMOD dispersion model was used to compute ambient air concentrations of SO2for 1-hr, 3-hr, and 24-hr using the emission inventory data for Lucas County, Ohio for theyear 1990. The estimated concentrations were classified based on the stability parameter,Monin-Obukhov length (L), for the two monitoring stations located in the area. The datawere divided into two atmospheric stability classes (stable and convective cases) as usedin the AERMOD model. These categories were further grouped into five sub categoriesbased on the value of L to learn about fine details of model performance. The modelevaluation was done using several statistical parameters used in air quality studies.AERMOD did not yield a satisfactory performance in predicting 1-hr and 3-hr averageconcentrations for the multi-source region but showed a slightly better performance inpredicting the 24-hr concentrations using urban option for the land use parameters. Themodel had a tendency to underpredict in both the stable and convective cases. In the 24-hr averaging period Fa2 showed a better performance than FB. The model seemed toperform better for the Main Street station than the Collins Park station. Limited analysisusing different land use parameters reported in the paper indicates that modelperformance may improve for certain cases. Other sources of error include theunavoidable scatter due to differences between wind direction and actual transport for anaveraging period, formulation of the model, and the emission inventory. The results ofthe study should be used cautiously because of the limited scope of the evaluation. Futurework should focus on the role of land use parameters in predicting concentrations at themonitors and finding ways to quantify errors due to other factors. However, it is clear thatmore guidance is needed in order to apply the AERMOD model for multi-source regions.Alternative schemes to divide the data should also be considered for analyzing modelperformance.
机译:使用AERMOD扩散模型,利用1990年俄亥俄州卢卡斯县的排放清单数据,计算1小时,3小时和24小时内的SO2空气浓度。估算的浓度基于稳定性参数进行分类,位于该区域的两个监测站的莫宁-奥布霍夫长度(L)。根据AERMOD模型,将数据分为两个大气稳定性类别(稳定和对流情况)。这些类别根据L的值进一步分为五个子类别,以了解模型性能的详细信息。使用空气质量研究中使用的几个统计参数进行了模型评估.AERMOD在预测多源区域的1小时和3小时平均浓度方面没有令人满意的表现,但是在预测使用24小时浓度的多源区域时表现出更好的表现土地使用参数的城市选择。在稳定和对流情况下,该模型都倾向于低估。在24小时平均时间内,Fa2的性能优于FB。对于Main Street车站,该模型似乎比Collins Park车站的性能更好。使用本文报告的不同土地利用参数进行的有限分析表明,在某些情况下模型的性能可能会提高。其他误差来源包括由于风向和平均运输期间平均时间之间的差异而导致的不可避免的分散,模型的制定以及排放清单。由于评估范围有限,应谨慎使用研究结果。未来的工作应着眼于土地利用参数在预测监测器浓度和寻找量化由于其他因素造成的误差的方法中的作用。但是,很明显,需要更多指导才能将AERMOD模型应用于多源区域。还应考虑使用划分数据的替代方案来分析模型性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号