【24h】

CO-CREATING KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES FOR COLLABORATIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

机译:共同创建协作产品开发的知识结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is abundant information available about the importance of company interactions with customers for improvingrnthe value provided by products and services. In this context, co-creation is a promising tool for creating a social processrnbased on collaboration between producers and users, in order to generate value for customers. Empirical testing and arnliterature review of co-creation methods show that further research is necessary to understand how to carry out suchrnwork, and how to transcend the aggregation of user inputs in order to achieve joint creation of meaningful value. Usingrnrecent empirical findings, this article contributes to the interaction processes in collaborative product development byrnproviding an analysis of three theoretical approaches: Collaborative Argumentation, Knowledge Structures, andrnReputation Systems.rnExperimental work was carried out, based on empirical findings. From this work, a set of hypotheses were developedrnconcerning the low level of collaborative interaction between participants. A literature review corroborates thernhypotheses. Then, based on expert advice and the literature review, three theoretical approaches were selected. Eachrnapproach provides elements for interaction process construction and analysis. First, collaborative argumentation addsrncollaboration, argumentation, and interaction protocols; second, knowledge structures add knowledge models, andrnknowledge integration process; and third, reputation systems provide norms and conventions. Currently we are workingrnon the modeling phase, which will be followed by a simulation; after that, an experiment with human agents will berncarried out.rnWe have found that co-creation as a social process requires norms, conventions, and appropriate use of the relevantrnresources, skills and productivity, in order to work properly. These elements can be incorporated and managed using arnreputation system. Furthermore, collaborative argumentation contributes by providing an approach oriented towardsrnobtaining well structured arguments that work as basic units of knowledge. Additionally, knowledge integrationrnprovides elements that are used to link different knowledge contributions. As a result, customer value, composed of usernvalue and hedonic value, and the components of customer experiences, can be identified, and then addressed by therncompany value offer.rnWork on understanding the interactions that take place in the social construction of knowledge structures helps tornadvance the state of the art of co-creation and contributes to the solution of empirically identified problems. Globalrnchallenges require joint work by different stake holders. In this situation, the theoretical approaches presented in thisrnpaper offer elements for constructing knowledge structures, based on arguments, that serve to make decisions about thernright kind of technology, or the elements of value that a particular technology must address in order to fulfill the needsrnof a community.
机译:关于公司与客户互动对于提高产品和服务所提供的价值的重要性的信息非常丰富。在这种情况下,共创是一种有前途的工具,可用于基于生产者和用户之间的协作来创建社交过程,从而为客户创造价值。对共创方法的实证测试和文献综述表明,有必要进行进一步的研究以了解如何进行此类工作,以及如何超越用户输入的汇总,以实现有意义的价值的共同创造。本文使用最新的经验发现,通过提供对三种理论方法的分析:协作论证,知识结构和声誉系统,为协作产品开发中的交互过程做出了贡献。基于经验发现进行了实验工作。通过这项工作,提出了关于参与者之间协作互动水平较低的一组假设。文献综述证实了假设。然后,根据专家意见和文献综述,选择了三种理论方法。每个方法都为交互过程的构建和分析提供了要素。首先,协作论证增加了协作,论证和交互协议;第二,知识结构增加知识模型,知识整合过程。第三,声誉系统提供规范和惯例。目前,我们正在建模阶段,随后将进行仿真;之后,我们将进行人类行为的实验。我们发现,共同创造作为一种社会过程,需要规范,惯例以及对相关资源,技能和生产力的适当使用才能正常工作。这些元素可以使用arnreputation系统合并和管理。此外,协作论证通过提供一种面向方法来获得良好的结构论证而发挥作用,这些论证是知识的基本单元。另外,知识整合提供了用于链接不同知识贡献的元素。结果,可以识别出由用户价值和享乐价值组成的客户价值以及客户体验的组成部分,然后通过公司价值提议来解决。了解知识结构的社会建构中发生的相互作用的工作有助于推进共同创造的最新技术水平,有助于解决经验确定的问题。全球性挑战要求不同利益相关者共同努力。在这种情况下,本白皮书中介绍的理论方法为基于论点的知识结构构建提供了要素,这些知识结构可用于对技术的正确种类或特定技术为满足需求而必须解决的价值要素做出决策。社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号