首页> 外文OA文献 >Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: Metaanalysis of randomized trials
【2h】

Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: Metaanalysis of randomized trials

机译:足月或足月胎膜早破的抗生素预防:随机试验的meta分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE:udThe objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in women with term or near-term premature rupture of membranes.ududSTUDY DESIGN:udSearches were performed in MEDLINE, OVID, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, ScienceDirect.com, MEDSCAPE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the use of a combination of key words and text words related to antibiotics, premature rupture of membranes, term, and trials from inception of each database to September 2014. We included all randomized trials of singleton gestations with premature rupture of membranes at 36 weeks or more, who were randomized to antibiotic prophylaxis or control (either placebo or no treatment). The primary outcomes included maternal chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. A subgroup analysis on studies with latency more than 12 hours was planned. Before data extraction, the review was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42014013928). The metaanalysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement.ududRESULTS:udWomen who received antibiotics had the same rate of chorioamnionitis (2.7% vs 3.7%; relative risk [RR], 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-1.12), endometritis (0.4% vs 0.9%; RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.18-1.10), maternal infection (3.1% vs 4.6%; RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.19-1.21), and neonatal sepsis (1.0% vs 1.4%; RR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.34-1.39). In the planned subgroup analysis, women with latency longer than 12 hours, who received antibiotics, had a lower rate of chorioamnionitis (2.9% vs 6.1%; RR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.27-0.91) and endometritis (0% vs 2.2%; RR, 0.12, 95% CI, 0.02-0.62) compared with the control group.ududCONCLUSION:udAntibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes is not associated with any benefits in either maternal or neonatal outcomes. In women with latency longer than 12 hours, prophylactic antibiotics are associated with significantly lower rates of chorioamnionitis by 51% and endometritis by 88%.
机译:目的: ud这项研究的目的是评估足月或近期胎膜早破妇女的抗生素预防效果。 ud ud研究设计: ud在MEDLINE,OVID,Scopus,ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO国际系统评价前瞻性登记册,EMBASE,ScienceDirect.com,MEDSCAPE以及对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册,结合使用与抗生素,膜过早破裂,术语和试验有关的关键词和文本词从每个数据库开始到2014年9月。我们纳入了所有单胎妊娠并在36周或更长时间后胎膜早破的随机试验,这些试验被随机分配至抗生素预防或对照(安慰剂或未治疗)。主要结局包括产妇绒膜羊膜炎和新生儿败血症。计划对潜伏期超过12小时的研究进行亚组分析。在提取数据之前,该评论已在PROSPERO国际系统评论前瞻性注册中注册(注册号CRD42014013928)。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的“首选报告项目”进行荟萃分析。 ud ud结果: ud接受抗生素的妇女患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的比率相同(2.7%比3.7%;相对风险[RR],0.73,95置信区间百分比[CI]为0.48-1.12),子宫内膜炎(0.4%比0.9%; RR为0.44、95%CI,0.18-1.10),孕产妇感染(3.1%比4.6%; RR为0.48、95%CI, 0.19-1.21)和新生儿败血症(1.0%比1.4%; RR,0.69,95%CI,0.34-1.39)。在计划的亚组分析中,接受抗生素的潜伏期超过12小时的妇女绒毛膜羊膜炎的发生率较低(2.9%比6.1%; RR,0.49、95%CI,0.27-0.91)和子宫内膜炎(0%比2.2) ud ud结论: ud为预防足月或近期胎膜早破而进行的抗生素预防与母体或新生儿结局均无任何相关性。在潜伏期超过12小时的女性中,预防性抗生素与绒毛膜羊膜炎的发生率显着降低51%,子宫内膜炎的发生率显着降低88%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Saccone G.; Berghella V.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号