首页> 外文OA文献 >Women or victims?: An analysis of National Action Plans in response to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security
【2h】

Women or victims?: An analysis of National Action Plans in response to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security

机译:妇女或受害者?:根据联合国安全理事会关于妇女,和平与安全的第1325号决议对国家行动计划进行分析

摘要

Conflict affects and engages men and women in different ways. United Nations Security Council’s Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security draws attention to the disproportionate impact on women during and after conflict. The resolution, adopted in 2000, calls for equal participation and full involvement. It challenges the traditional notion of gender equality, highlights the unequal and gender-specific impact on women in the context of conflict and recognizes their undervalued role in peace-building and conflict resolution. Resolution 1325 is a key milestone in international human rights and humanitarian law. This year is the fifteenth anniversary of the resolution, but still much needs to be done to implement the resolution in a successful way.This thesis aims to analyse National Action Plans adopted in response to the implementing of the Security Council Resolution 1325 by the five countries: the Republic of Korea, Iraq, Nigeria, Macedonia and Kyrgyzstan, to examine how an international document linked to peace and security is interpreted and converted into national aims in terms of gender mainstreaming and securitizing women’s rights in the context of conflict. The empirical material consists of these five National Action Plans. By conducting a critical discourse analysis the content of the action plans are analysed and assessed in relation to the four core mandates of the resolution, Participation, Protection, Prevention and Peace-building and the theoretical framework based on theories regarding gender and power structures.National efforts, aims and priorities to achieve gender mainstreaming and the provisions of the resolution are crucial for women’s access to rights and agency. The findings of the analysis show five rather different interpretations of the resolution. The rhetoric and restrictive formulations in the plans occasionally tend to boost deep-rooted gender structures and assumptions such as women are victims in need of protection.
机译:冲突以不同的方式影响着男人和女人。联合国安理会关于妇女,和平与安全的第1325号决议提请人们注意冲突期间和冲突后对妇女的巨大影响。 2000年通过的决议要求平等参与和充分参与。它挑战了传统的两性平等概念,突出了在冲突中对妇女的不平等和针对性别的影响,并认识到她们在建设和平和解决冲突中的作用被低估了。第1325号决议是国际人权和人道主义法的关键里程碑。今年是该决议通过十五周年,但要成功执行该决议仍需做很多工作。本文旨在分析为响应五个国家执行安全理事会第1325号决议而通过的《国家行动计划》 :大韩民国,伊拉克,尼日利亚,马其顿和吉尔吉斯斯坦,研究如何将与和平与安全有关的国际文件解释为性别主流化和在冲突中将妇女权利证券化的国家目标。经验材料包括这五个国家行动计划。通过进行重要的话语分析,将根据决议的四个核心任务,参与,保护,预防和建设和平以及基于性别和权力结构理论的理论框架对行动计划的内容进行分析和评估。实现性别主流化的努力,目标和优先事项,以及决议的规定对于妇女获得权利和代理权至关重要。分析结果表明,该决议有五种截然不同的解释。计划中的措辞和限制性措辞有时会助长根深蒂固的性别结构和假设,例如妇女是需要保护的受害者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Malmborg Lisa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号